跳到正文
简报说明

来源与收录范围

汇总期刊目录中的 16 个期刊来源,以及 arXiv 计量经济学与相关统计、金融分类和主题检索中的预印本。期刊题录主要来自 Crossref,可靠摘要保留补充来源;期刊官网链接可在论文检索的说明中核对。

保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。待核验、范围外及撤回记录不进入公开简报。基础文献按学习与研究需要单独选编。

此前日简报及周、月简报按可核实的原站发表、首次提交和修订日期归档;历史补录只留在文献库。期刊仅纳入收录当月新发表或提前取得题录的论文;只有月份的记录仅进入对应月简报。arXiv 同期只计一次,首次发布优先;未保存的中间版本无法补算。撤回内容会同步移除;所有历史补录仍可在论文检索中查找。

当前结果:已发表 0 篇 · 待刊 0 篇 · 预印本 25 篇

关键词匹配标题、摘要、作者或 DOI;支持部分字母,多词同时匹配,双引号匹配短语。

本期动态按期刊、arXiv 首次发布、arXiv 修订分组,组内默认本文引用优先。也可选择作者引用优先或最新收录。

期刊论文在前,预印本在后。组内先看本文引用,再看已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,最后按当前日期顺序排序。

“作者引用”指已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,不合计共同作者。目前作者指标只来自有身份关联快照的预印本,普通期刊条目可能没有该项数据;本页 1/24 篇有可核验作者指标。

本文引用采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本;缺失不记作零。累计引用会随时间积累,可结合近年范围比较;引用数和作者发表经历是阅读线索,不代表论文质量或同行评审状态。

“作者发表记录”展示作者已有论文的可核验发表记录,不证明该预印本已接收或通过同行评审。

正常题录、可靠摘要和引用同步继续;AI 解读依据可靠材料,材料不足时保留待解读状态。

本期 25 篇
导出

arXiv · 本期首次发布

An economically-consistent discrete choice model with flexible utility specification based on artificial neural networks

基于神经网络灵活效用设定的经济一致性离散选择模型

Random utility maximisation (RUM) models are one of the cornerstones of discrete choice modelling. However, specifying the utility function of RUM models is not straightforward and has a considerable impact on the resulting interpretable outcomes and welfare measures. In this paper, we propose a new discrete choice model based on artificial neural networks (ANNs) named "Alternative-Specific and Shared weights Neural Network (ASS-NN)", which provides a further balance between…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

(Empirical) Bayes Approaches to Parallel Trends

应对平行趋势偏离的贝叶斯与经验贝叶斯方法

We consider Bayes and Empirical Bayes (EB) approaches for dealing with violations of parallel trends. In the Bayes approach, the researcher specifies a prior over both the pre-treatment violations of parallel trends $δ_{pre}$ and the post-treatment violations $δ_{post}$. The researcher then updates their posterior about the post-treatment bias $δ_{post}$ given an estimate of the pre-trends $δ_{pre}$. This allows them to form posterior means and credible sets for the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Covariate Ordered Systematic Sampling as an Improvement to Randomized Controlled Trials

协变量排序系统抽样:改进随机对照试验的分配方法

The Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) or A/B testing is considered the gold standard method for estimating causal effects. Fisher famously advocated randomly allocating experiment units into treatment and control groups to preclude systematic biases. We propose a variant of systematic sampling called Covariate Ordered Systematic Sampling (COSS). In COSS, we order experimental units using a pre-experiment covariate and allocate them alternately into treatment and control…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Weighting methods for truncation by death in cluster-randomized trials

整群随机试验中处理死亡截断的加权方法

Patient-centered outcomes, such as quality of life and length of hospital stay, are the focus in a wide array of clinical studies. However, participants in randomized trials for elderly or critically and severely ill patient populations may have truncated or undefined non-mortality outcomes if they do not survive through the measurement time point. To address truncation by death, the survivor average causal effect (SACE) has been proposed as a causally interpretable subgroup…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Automated Discovery of Functional Actual Causes in Complex Environments

复杂环境中功能性实际原因的自动发现

Reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms often struggle to learn policies that generalize to novel situations due to issues such as causal confusion, overfitting to irrelevant factors, and failure to isolate control of state factors. These issues stem from a common source: a failure to accurately identify and exploit state-specific causal relationships in the environment. While some prior works in RL aim to identify these relationships explicitly, they rely on informal…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Improved bounds and inference on optimal regimes

最优治疗策略的改进界限与推断

Point identification of causal effects requires strong assumptions that are unreasonable in many practical settings. However, informative bounds on these effects can often be derived under plausible assumptions. Even when these bounds are wide or cover null effects, they can guide practical decisions based on formal decision theoretic criteria. Here we derive new results on optimal treatment regimes in settings where the effect of interest is bounded. These results are…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Propensity Score Analysis with Guaranteed Subgroup Balance

保证亚组平衡的倾向得分分析

Estimating the causal treatment effects by subgroups is important in observational studies when the treatment effect heterogeneity may be present. Existing propensity score methods rely on a correctly specified propensity score model. Model misspecification results in biased treatment effect estimation and covariate imbalance. We proposed a new algorithm, the propensity score analysis with guaranteed subgroup balance (G-SBPS), to achieve covariate mean balance in all…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Two-step Estimation of Network Formation Models with Unobserved Heterogeneities and Strategic Interactions

含未观测异质性与策略互动的网络形成模型两步估计

In this paper, I characterize the network formation process as a static game of incomplete information, where the latent payoff of forming a link between two individuals depends on the structure of the network, as well as private information on agents' attributes. I allow agents' private unobserved attributes to be correlated with observed attributes through individual fixed effects. Using data from a single large network, I propose a two-step estimator for the model…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Difference-in-Differences under Bipartite Network Interference: A Framework for Quasi-Experimental Assessment of the Effects of Environmental Policies on Health

二部网络干扰下的双重差分:环境政策健康效应的准实验评估

Pollution from coal-fired power plants has been linked to substantial health and mortality burdens in the US. In recent decades, federal regulatory policies have spurred efforts to curb emissions through various actions, such as the installation of emissions control technologies on power plants. However, assessing the health impacts of these measures, particularly over longer periods of time, is complicated by several factors. First, the units that potentially receive the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Identification and Estimation of Nonseparable Triangular Equations with Mismeasured Instruments

工具变量存在测量误差时非可分三角方程的识别与估计

In this paper, I study the nonparametric identification and estimation of the marginal effect of an endogenous variable $X$ on the outcome variable $Y$, given a potentially mismeasured instrument variable $W^*$, without assuming linearity or separability of the functions governing the relationship between observables and unobservables. To address the challenges arising from the co-existence of measurement error and nonseparability, I first employ the deconvolution technique…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Inference of Causal Networks using a Topological Threshold

利用拓扑阈值推断因果网络

We propose a constraint-based algorithm, which automatically determines causal relevance thresholds, to infer causal networks from data. We call these topological thresholds. We present two methods for determining the threshold: the first seeks a set of edges that leaves no disconnected nodes in the network; the second seeks a causal large connected component in the data. We tested these methods both for discrete synthetic and real data, and compared the results with those…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

What Hides behind Unfairness? Exploring Dynamics Fairness in Reinforcement Learning

不公平背后是什么?强化学习中的动态公平性

In sequential decision-making problems involving sensitive attributes like race and gender, reinforcement learning (RL) agents must carefully consider long-term fairness while maximizing returns. Recent works have proposed many different types of fairness notions, but how unfairness arises in RL problems remains unclear. In this paper, we address this gap in the literature by investigating the sources of inequality through a causal lens. We first analyse the causal…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Redefining the Shortest Path Problem Formulation of the Linear Non-Gaussian Acyclic Model: Pairwise Likelihood Ratios, Prior Knowledge, and Path Enumeration

重构 LiNGAM 的最短路径表述:成对似然比、先验知识与路径枚举

Effective causal discovery is essential for learning the causal graph from observational data. The linear non-Gaussian acyclic model (LiNGAM) operates under the assumption of a linear data generating process with non-Gaussian noise in determining the causal graph. Its assumption of unmeasured confounders being absent, however, poses practical limitations. In response, empirical research has shown that the reformulation of LiNGAM as a shortest path problem (LiNGAM-SPP)…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

General Bayesian inference for causal effects using covariate balancing procedure

利用协变量平衡程序进行因果效应的一般贝叶斯推断

In observational studies, the propensity score plays a central role in estimating causal effects of interest. The inverse probability weighting (IPW) estimator is commonly used for this purpose. However, if the propensity score model is misspecified, the IPW estimator may produce biased estimates of causal effects. Previous studies have proposed some robust propensity score estimation procedures. However, these methods require considering parameters that dominate the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Regret Analysis in Threshold Policy Design

阈值政策设计中的遗憾分析

Threshold policies are decision rules that assign treatments based on whether an observable characteristic exceeds a certain threshold. They are widespread across multiple domains, including welfare programs, taxation, and clinical medicine. This paper examines the problem of designing threshold policies using experimental data, when the goal is to maximize the population welfare. First, I characterize the regret - a measure of policy optimality - of the Empirical Welfare…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

From Predictive Algorithms to Automatic Generation of Anomalies

从预测算法到理论反例的自动生成

How can we extract theoretical insights from machine learning algorithms? We take a familiar lesson: researchers often turn their intuitions into theoretical insights by constructing "anomalies" -- specific examples highlighting hypothesized flaws in a theory, such as the Allais paradox and the Kahneman-Tversky choice experiments for expected utility. We develop procedures that replace researchers' intuitions with predictive algorithms: given a predictive algorithm and a…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Automated, efficient and model-free inference for randomized clinical trials via data-driven covariate adjustment

通过数据驱动协变量调整实现随机临床试验的自动化高效无模型推断

In 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued guidance for adjustment of covariates in randomized clinical trials, emphasizing its role in enhancing precision and power through prognostic baseline variables. Despite its potential, many trials underutilize this method partly due to challenges in pre-specifying optimal baseline covariates and their functional forms. We explore the potential of automated, data-adaptive methods-including stepwise regression, Lasso and…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

arXiv · 本期修订

Multiply Robust Difference-in-Differences Estimation of Causal Effect Curves for Continuous Exposures

连续暴露因果效应曲线的多重稳健双重差分估计

Researchers commonly use difference-in-differences (DiD) designs to evaluate public policy interventions. While methods exist for estimating effects in the context of binary interventions, policies often result in varied exposures across regions implementing the policy. Yet, existing approaches for incorporating continuous exposures face substantial limitations in addressing confounding variables associated with intervention status, exposure levels, and outcome trends. These…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Statistical Inference for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Discovered by Generic Machine Learning in Randomized Experiments

随机实验中通用机器学习发现的异质性处理效应:统计推断

Researchers are increasingly turning to machine learning (ML) algorithms to investigate causal heterogeneity in randomized experiments. Despite their promise, ML algorithms may fail to accurately ascertain heterogeneous treatment effects under practical settings with many covariates and small sample size. In addition, the quantification of estimation uncertainty remains a challenge. We develop a general approach to statistical inference for heterogeneous treatment effects…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Graphical criteria for the identification of marginal causal effects in continuous-time survival and event-history analyses

连续时间生存与事件史分析中边际因果效应识别的图准则

We consider continuous-time survival or more general event-history settings, where the aim is to infer the causal effect of a time-dependent treatment process. This is formalised as the effect on the outcome event of a (possibly hypothetical) intervention on the intensity of the treatment process, i.e. a stochastic intervention. To establish whether valid inference about the interventional situation can be drawn from typical observational, i.e. non-experimental, data we…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Forecasting Algorithms for Causal Inference with Panel Data

用于面板数据因果推断的预测算法

Conducting causal inference with panel data is a core challenge in social science research. We adapt a deep neural architecture for time series forecasting (the N-BEATS algorithm) to more accurately impute the counterfactual evolution of a treated unit had treatment not occurred. Across a range of settings, the resulting estimator (``SyNBEATS'') significantly outperforms commonly employed methods (synthetic controls, two-way fixed effects), and attains comparable or more…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

lmw: Linear Model Weights for Causal Inference

lmw:用于因果推断的线性模型权重

The linear regression model is widely used in the biomedical and social sciences as well as in policy and business research to adjust for covariates and estimate the average effects of treatments. Behind every causal inference endeavor there is a hypothetical randomized experiment. However, in routine regression analyses in observational studies, it is unclear how well the adjustments made by regression approximate key features of randomized experiments, such as covariate…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A General Identification Algorithm For Data Fusion Problems Under Systematic Selection

系统性选择下数据融合问题的一般识别算法

Causal inference is made challenging by confounding, selection bias, and other complications. A common approach to addressing these difficulties is the inclusion of auxiliary data on the superpopulation of interest. Such data may measure a different set of variables, or be obtained under different experimental conditions than the primary dataset. Analysis based on multiple datasets must carefully account for similarities between datasets, while appropriately accounting for…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Combinatorial Central Limit Theorem for Stratified Randomization

分层随机化的组合中心极限定理

This paper establishes a combinatorial central limit theorem for stratified randomization, which holds under a Lindeberg-type condition. The theorem allows for an arbitrary number or sizes of strata, with the sole requirement being that each stratum contains at least two units. This flexibility accommodates both a growing number of large and small strata simultaneously, while imposing minimal conditions. We then apply this result to derive the asymptotic distributions of two…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓