跳到正文
收录说明
收录范围
保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础,以及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。书评、刊务及明确无关内容不公开;身份或相关性证据不足的记录保留待核,补充可靠材料后可重新判断。
预印本来自 arXiv 计量经济学及相关统计、金融分类和主题检索。主题检索从 2021 年起回补;关注作者追溯更早年份,部分历史文献按已核验编号补录。收录不表示通过同行评审,仍可能遗漏。
本库首次提交范围:2004-06-23 — 2026-10-14。
阅读范围
默认显示本库全部预印本。可选“优先阅读”:至少一位作者同时满足有可核验的本站覆盖期刊正式发表记录,且 OpenAlex 总引用超过 1,000 次。按同一作者身份匹配,两项缺一不可。此筛选提供阅读线索,不作为论文质量判断。
日期与排序
默认按最近修订排序;年份和日期筛选使用首次提交时间。同一 arXiv 编号的修订会合并。仅有月份或年份时,日期区间相交也会纳入。

日期精度:到日 275 篇 · 到月 0 篇 · 到年 0 篇

分类与引用
领域和方法依据题名、摘要初步分类,可人工修正;分类不代表论文质量。引用数采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本。
DID 与事件研究:双重差分、多期处理与事件研究。
更新与 AI 解读
正常题录、可靠摘要与引用同步继续;日、周、月简报按核实的发表与修订日期汇总,历史补录保留在文献库。AI 解读依据可靠摘要或已核实原文片段,已有解读保留供阅读参考;缺少可靠材料的条目保持待解读,浏览页面不会触发生成。
275 篇论文
导出

Was Stalin Necessary? Counterfactual Evidence on Soviet Growth

斯大林是否必要?苏联经济增长的反事实证据

This article evaluates whether the exceptionally rapid growth of the Russian and Soviet economy after 1928 requires a specifically Stalinist explanation. The analysis treats this historical question as a sequence of increasingly demanding counterfactual comparisons rather than a binary comparison between observed growth and a single alternative. Long run output series from the Global Macro Database and the Maddison Project are combined with synthetic control, augmented…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Machine-Learning-Compatible Omnibus Test for Treatment Effect Heterogeneity

兼容机器学习的处理效应异质性综合检验

This study proposes a formal, computationally efficient nonparametric omnibus test for treatment-effect heterogeneity that is compatible with a broad class of estimators, including modern machine-learning methods. The test is designed for settings in which identification can rely on high-dimensional controls while heterogeneity is assessed with respect to a low-dimensional subset of covariates. We derive the test statistic's asymptotic null distribution and develop a…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Repeated sampling of different individuals within the same clusters to improve precision of longitudinal estimators: the DISC design

固定簇内重复抽取不同个体以提高纵向估计精度:DISC 设计

Background: Longitudinal studies often involve repeated cluster sampling of a population at multiple time points, such as in difference-in-differences (DID) studies. Although cohort designs typically lead to more efficient estimators relative to repeated cross-sectional (RCS) designs, they are often impractical. Methods: We describe the DISC (Different Individuals, Same Clusters) design, a sampling scheme that improves the precision of estimators in these settings. The DISC…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Remote Work: Driver or Deterrent of Digital Product Innovation

远程办公:数字产品创新的推动力还是阻碍?

As firms adopt divergent policies regarding work-from-home (WFH), the implications of remote work for collaborative and interdependent outcomes such as digital product innovation remain uncertain. This study examines how remote work adoption affects continuous digital product innovation using a panel dataset of mobile applications. We identify firm-level remote work adoption from job postings data and estimate its effects on app innovation using a staggered…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Pseudo Panel Difference-in-Differences (DiD) Analysis of Online Shopping Behavior in the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) Region

普吉特海湾地区在线购物行为的伪面板双重差分分析

Online shopping is a growing trend, particularly following the COVID-19 lock-downs enacted by many cities. Understanding these trends requires robust panel dat methods. However, panel data (i.e., with repeated measurements of the same observational units) are often unavailable. In this study, we use a propensity score weighting (PSW) approach to adjust repeated cross-sectional travel diary surveys collected in the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) region. The most common…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Structural Nested Mean Models Under Parallel Trends Assumptions

平行趋势假设下的结构嵌套均值模型

We link and extend two approaches to estimating time-varying treatment effects on repeated continuous outcomes--time-varying Difference in Differences (DiD; see Roth et al. (2023) and Chaisemartin et al. (2023) for reviews) and Structural Nested Mean Models (SNMMs; see Vansteelandt and Joffe (2014) for a review). In particular, we show that SNMMs, previously known to be nonparametrically identified under a no unobserved confounding assumption, are also identified under a…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Estimation and Inference on Average Treatment Effect in Percentage Points under Heterogeneity

异质性下以百分点表示的平均处理效应估计与推断

In semi-logarithmic regressions, treatment coefficients are often interpreted as approximations of an average treatment effect (ATE) in percentage points. This paper highlights the overlooked bias of this approximation under treatment effect heterogeneity, arising from Jensen's inequality. The issue is particularly relevant for difference-in-differences designs with log-transformed outcomes and staggered treatment adoption, where treatment effects may vary across groups and…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Group-Level Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in Difference-in-Differences: A Balanced Approach

双重差分中的组间处理效应异质性:一种平衡方法

Understanding how treatment effects vary across groups is central to policy evaluation. In Difference-in-Differences designs, heterogeneity is often studied using subgroup or triple-difference analyses, which can suffer from conservative inference, reliance on parametric interaction structures, and sensitivity to differences in covariate distributions across groups. We propose the Balanced Group Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (BGATT), a new estimand that isolates…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

When Do Treatment Changes Identify Causal Effects?

处理变化何时能够识别因果效应?

This paper clarifies the identifying assumptions underlying causal inference based on treatment changes rather than levels, and their relationship to conventional identification strategies. We characterize two structural models, with non-nested assumptions, under which treatment-change identification is valid conditional on observed covariates by differencing out time-constant confounders that are additive in the treatment equation. The assumptions underlying treatment…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

State policy heterogeneity analyses: considerations and proposals

州级政策异质性分析:问题辨析与方法建议

State-level policy studies often conduct heterogeneity analyses that quantify how treatment effects vary across state characteristics. These analyses may be used to inform state-specific policy decisions, or to infer how the effect of a policy changes in combination with other state characteristics. However, in state-level settings with varied contexts and policy landscapes, multiple versions of similar policies, and differential policy implementation, the causal quantities…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A missed opportunity? Labor demand and workforce diversity

错失的机会?劳动力需求与劳动力多样性

How do labor demand shocks affect workforce diversity in the absence of targeted diversity policies? A conceptual framework illustrates the potential trade-off between the demographic and quality composition of a workforce when there is a positive labor demand shock. Exploiting the German reunification as a natural experiment, we analyze the academic labor market where nearly all social sciences professors in East Germany were replaced while STEM faculty remained largely…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Test for Treatment Heterogeneity under a Distributional Difference-in-Difference Framework

分布双重差分框架下的处理异质性检验

We develop a novel distributional Difference-in-Differences (DiD) framework to capture treatment heterogeneity across outcome distributions. By leveraging optimal transport, we use the control group to estimate the untreated distributional drift from the pre- to post-treatment period and apply it to the treated group's pre-treatment baseline, constructing a counterfactual distribution under the assumption of no treatment effect. We frame the null hypothesis as a…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Choosing A Headline Estimand from Matching, DID, and Hybrid Designs: A Minimax-Regret Approach

从匹配、双重差分与混合设计中选择主要估计目标:最小最大遗憾方法

Researchers using panel data to estimate causal effects routinely choose among three approaches to using past outcomes: difference-in-differences (DID), conditioning on lagged outcomes (matching, M), and a hybrid that does both (DIDM). The corresponding identifying assumptions are non-nested, leaving little guidance on which to report. We give conditions under which the corresponding estimands are ordered, with DIDM bracketed between matching and DID. This makes DIDM the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Semiparametric Difference-in-Differences Estimation With Missing Not at Random Data: A Shadow Variable Approach

非随机缺失数据下的半参数双重差分:影子变量方法

This paper considers a semiparametric difference-in-differences (DID) framework for identifying and estimating treatment effects on the treated (ATT) when outcomes are missing not at random (MNAR), and a fully observed shadow variable is available. The shadow variable is assumed to be associated with the outcome evolution but independent of the missingness process, conditional on covariates and the possibly unobserved outcome evolution. We establish the identification…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Structural Matrix Autoregressive Model for the Joint Dynamics of Volume, Volatility, and Returns

交易量、波动率与收益联合动态的结构矩阵自回归模型

This paper proposes a Structural Matrix Autoregressive (SMAR) model for the joint analysis of asset returns, realized volatility, and trading volume in a large-dimensional setting. This framework simultaneously captures dynamic spillovers across financial variables and cross-sectional dependence across assets while preserving a parsimonious parameterization relative to conventional vector autoregressive models. The model is estimated on daily data for the constituents of the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Semiparametric Bayesian Difference-in-Differences

半参数贝叶斯双重差分

This paper studies semiparametric Bayesian inference for the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) within the difference-in-differences (DiD) research design. We propose two new Bayesian methods with frequentist validity. The first one is the semiparametric Bayesian outcome regression, where we place a Gaussian process prior on the conditional mean function of the control group. The second method is a doubly robust Bayesian procedure that adjusts the prior…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Difference-in-Differences when Parallel Trends Holds Conditional on Covariates

协变量条件平行趋势下的双重差分

We consider difference-in-differences identification and estimation strategies when the parallel trends assumption holds conditional on covariates, which can be time-varying, time-invariant, or both. We uncover several weaknesses of two-way fixed effects (TWFE) regressions in this context. The most important, which we call \textit{hidden linearity bias}, arises because transformations that eliminate unit fixed effects also transform the covariates, either implicitly changing…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Recovering Direct Price Effects of Environmental Amenities in Housing Markets: Regression and Causal Machine Learning Model Assessment with Empirical Monte Carlo Simulation

住房环境便利设施的直接价格效应:回归与因果机器学习的模拟评估

Hedonic price models are widely used to assess how environmental amenities affect property values, yet methodological guidance for estimating direct price effects remains sparse. We conduct an empirical Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate the performance of traditional and causal machine learning approaches for estimating the direct unmediated price effect of spatially delineated amenities on treated properties (DUET), a conservative lower-bound approximation for welfare…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Semiparametric Inference for Causal Effects on Functional Outcomes

函数型结局因果效应的半参数推断

Difference-in-differences (DiD) is a cornerstone of causal inference, yet extending it to functional outcomes is not a routine scalar generalization; rather, it entails three fundamental challenges in identification, inference, and observation. This paper develops a comprehensive semiparametric inference framework for functional DiD with discretely observed data. First, we define the functional average treatment effect under parallel trends and derive its efficient influence…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Causal Duration Analysis with Diff-in-Diff

基于双重差分的因果持续时间分析

In economic program evaluation, it is common to obtain panel data in which outcomes are indicators that an individual has reached an absorbing state. For example, they may indicate whether an individual has exited a period of unemployment, passed an exam, left a marriage, or had their parole revoked. The parallel trends assumption that underpins difference-in-differences generally fails in such settings. We suggest identifying conditions similar to those of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Bayesian Estimation of Cohort-Time-Stratum Specific Effects in Staggered Difference-in-Differences

错位实施双重差分中组别—时间—分层效应的贝叶斯估计

Difference-in-Differences designs with staggered treatment adoption are widely used to study heterogeneous treatment effects across cohorts and time periods. We develop a probabilistic framework for estimating potentially high-dimensional ATT arrays that vary across cohorts, periods, and strata defined by baseline covariates. The framework jointly estimates subgroup-specific treatment effects through a unified likelihood-based model, stabilizing inference in sparse…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Quantile and Distribution Treatment Effects on the Treated with Possibly Non-Continuous Outcomes

可能非连续结局下处理组的分位数与分布处理效应

Applied Difference-in-Differences studies often involve outcomes that are discrete, mixed, censored, or otherwise non-continuously distributed, while policy questions frequently concern distributional effects rather than mean effects alone. This paper develops a distributional DiD framework for identifying and conducting uniform inference on distribution and quantile treatment effects on the treated in such settings under stated identifying and regularity conditions.…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A simple distributional difference-in-differences estimator for univariate and bivariate outcomes

单变量与双变量结局的简便分布双重差分估计量

We provide a simple distribution regression estimator for treatment effects in the difference-in-differences (DiD) design. Our procedure is particularly useful when the treatment effect differs across the distribution of the outcome variable. Our proposed estimator easily incorporates covariates and, importantly, can be extended to settings where the treatment potentially affects the joint distribution of multiple outcomes. Our key identifying restriction is that the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Comment on Scientific production in the era of large language models

对《大语言模型时代的科学产出》的评论

Kusumegi et al. (2025) study whether researchers' preprint output rises after adopting large language models (LLMs), dating adoption as the first month in which at least one submitted abstract exceeds an LLM-detection threshold. We show that this treatment-timing rule is mechanically related to output. The probability that at least one paper is flagged in a month is increasing in the number of papers submitted in that month, so detected-adoption months are disproportionately…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓