论文检索

哪项政策有效、在哪里有效？双重差分中的州级处理效应估计与推断AI 解读

Policies with a common objective and implementation date may differ in details or context. We distinguish the aggregate average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) from sub-aggregate ATTs defined by implementation cohort, jurisdiction, period, or policy type. UN-DID and DID-INT, two DiD estimators that construct jurisdiction-by-time effects, estimate these ATTs under parallel-trends conditions matched to the aggregation. In CPS placebo-law simulations, randomization…

测地线双重差分AI 解读

Difference-in-differences (DID) is a widely used quasi-experimental design for causal inference, traditionally applied to scalar or Euclidean outcomes, while extensions to outcomes residing in non-Euclidean spaces remain limited. Existing methods for such outcomes have primarily focused on univariate distributions, leveraging linear operations in the space of quantile functions, but these approaches cannot be directly extended to outcomes in general metric spaces. In this…

存在网络溢出的交错双重差分：识别与估计AI 解读

This paper studies staggered difference-in-differences designs in which treated and comparison units can be exposed to other units' adoption. Using an exposure mapping specified by the researcher, we define realized and counterfactual exposure states and decompose the total effect into a switching effect of own adoption and a spillover effect under no own adoption. Conditional parallel trends identify the total and switching effects by matching, respectively, the…

加权目标量的稳健推断AI 解读

Researchers often conduct inference on weighted estimands, defined as weighted averages of group-level effects. Example settings include event studies with cohort-level effects and experiments with site-level effects. Under heterogeneous effects, different weighting schemes yield estimands with distinct empirical and policy interpretations, leading to ambiguity and disagreement over the choice of weights. I establish bounds on differences between weighted estimands and…

通过双重差分学习说服效应AI 解读

We develop a difference-in-differences framework to measure the persuasive impact of informational treatments on behavior in staggered treatment settings. We introduce two causal parameters, the forward and backward average persuasion rates on the treated, which refine the average treatment effect on the treated. The forward rate excludes cases of "preaching to the converted," while the backward rate omits "talking to a brick wall" cases. The backward rate coincides with the…

双重差分中以研究范围换取可信度AI 解读

When parallel trends fails for some treated cohorts but not others, the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT), an average over all of them, is exactly the target that becomes hard to recover. We propose changing the estimand rather than defending it. The credible-subpopulation local ATT (LATT) is the effect for the subpopulation of cohorts whose parallel trends is credible, and it is point-identified under parallel trends for the selected cohorts alone, a weaker…

分布双重差分：分位数反演前聚合还是反演后聚合？AI 解读

Staggered distributional difference-in-differences produces cohort-specific potential-outcome distributions, but applied work typically wants one overall quantile treatment effect. Two natural summaries---averaging cohort quantile treatment effects (QTTs) and mixing cohort distributions before inversion---use the same policy weights yet answer different target-population questions and can disagree even in sign. We derive the exact sharp interval for their gap conditional on…

让时间提供信息：中断时间序列的识别与高斯过程估计AI 解读

We study causal inference in interrupted time series designs where a treatment affects every unit simultaneously, so that the contemporaneous controls used by difference-in-differences and synthetic control are unavailable and the counterfactual must be extrapolated from a unit's own pre-treatment history. We establish identification within the potential outcomes framework and estimate the counterfactual by Gaussian process regression. Rather than committing to a single…

诚实置信区间的局部渐近功效AI 解读

Confidence intervals that are conservative against an untestable bias, called bias-aware or honest, are now standard in DiD, IV, RD, and factor-model settings. This paper characterises the local power of the tests they induce. Power is governed by the rate of the bias bound relative to the sampling rate, giving three regimes: when the bound vanishes faster than the standard error, conservatism is asymptotically free; when the two are of the same order it costs a bounded,…

交错双重差分中的部分同质性AI 解读

In staggered difference-in-differences (DiD) designs, units enter treatment at different calendar times, so the treatment effect is not a single number but a set of Cohort-Average Treatment effects on the Treated (CATTs), one per cohort-time cell. Estimating every CATT as its own parameter, as the standard fully flexible estimator does, is unbiased but inefficient when some of these effects are in fact equal, whereas pooling them all into a single two-way fixed effects…

对提前反应与平行趋势违背的联合敏感性分析AI 解读

Two key identifying assumptions used to justify difference-in-differences are parallel trends and no anticipation, yet both may fail in practice. I propose a class of assumptions that constitute deviations from no anticipation and derive closed-form, sharp bounds for several common treatment effect parameters while simultaneously relaxing parallel trends. Deviations from both assumptions are jointly disciplined using observed pre-trends. When some anticipation is imposed,…

小样本与短面板：用贴近实际的数据评估政策评价方法AI 解读

Methods for estimating causal effects in longitudinal, quasi-experimental settings are widely used in economics, public health, political science, and other fields. However, studies evaluating effects of health policies often rely on limited sample sizes, both in terms of study units and time periods analyzed. Synthetic difference-in-differences (SDiD) and the augmented synthetic control method (ASCM) are recently developed methods for evaluating the effects of policy…

生育惩罚的识别AI 解读

A large literature estimates child penalties using event studies by gender, normalizing by predicted earnings absent children and reporting the gender gap. This paper studies the identification framework underlying this strategy. Within gender, I argue that parallel trends is violated by selection into the timing of parenthood: higher human capital individuals delay childbirth and have steeper earnings trajectories. Between genders, I articulate the normalized design's…

交错处理采纳下结合双重差分调整的风险集传输合成控制AI 解读

In staggered treatment-adoption designs, later-treated units are valid controls for an earlier-treated cohort only until their own treatment begins, so the admissible donor set contracts with event time. Fixing the donor pool at the longest horizon discards temporarily eligible donors, whereas re-estimating synthetic-control weights independently at each horizon can make the counterfactual unstable as donor composition changes. We propose Risk-Set Transported Synthetic…

超越错位实施双重差分的平行趋势：高阶平行性下的识别AI 解读

In difference-in-differences designs, the parallel trends assumption requires that the outcome gap between treated and control units would have remained flat absent treatment. Pre-treatment event studies frequently reject this flat-gap requirement. Existing responses include parametric trend controls and bounds on the treatment effect under assumptions about the magnitude of the violation. This paper shows that point identification of cohort-specific and aggregate treatment…

序列相关下的稳健双样本推断AI 解读

We propose robust inference for two-sample comparison with time-series data under serial dependence and heterogeneous long-run variances. Standardizing with orthonormal-basis (series HAR) projections, we develop two-sample t-tests and, for joint hypotheses on a vector of means, a series HAR Wald statistic. Because the increasing-K chi-square limit tends to over-reject, we propose Welch-type fixed-K t- and F-approximations with adjusted degrees of freedom. We further develop…

处理选择与平行趋势AI 解读

We study the role of selection into treatment in difference-in-differences (DiD) designs. We derive necessary and sufficient conditions for parallel trends assumptions under general classes of selection mechanisms. These conditions characterize the empirical content of parallel trends and clarify the trade-offs between assumptions about selection into treatment and restrictions on the time series properties of the potential outcomes required for DiD methods. We use the…

利用处理前趋势进行双重差分推断AI 解读

Difference-in-differences (DID) are sometimes estimated with many pre-treatment periods. In such settings, the observed pre-treatment outcome evolutions provide direct information about the magnitude of shocks that could also occur after treatment. This paper proposes a simple inference procedure that uses those pre-trends as the reference distribution for the post-treatment DID. The procedure is closely related to existing conformal inference procedures, but its…

动态处理效应与一般嵌套泛函的自动去偏机器学习AI 解读

Many canonical models in causal inference and structural econometrics have recursive identification formulas. In causal inference, recursion arises when identification requires both pre- and post-treatment covariates. For example, short-term surrogate outcomes are measured after the treatment, and serve as necessary covariates when identifying long-term effects. Post-treatment covariates are also required for identification of dynamic difference-in-differences designs,…

各期处理均连续分布时的双重差分估计量AI 解读

When studying the effects of taxes, tariffs, or prices using panel data, the treatment is often continuously distributed in every period. We develop difference-in-differences (DID) estimators for such settings. We partition units into switchers, whose treatment changes between consecutive periods, and stayers, whose treatment remains constant. Under a parallel-trends assumption, we show that the slopes of switchers' potential outcomes with respect to the treatment are…

用于交错实施的固定效应因果森林及其医保扩张应用AI 解读

Difference-in-differences with staggered adoption identifies group-time average treatment effects ATT(g,t) by comparing each cohort to units not yet treated, which avoids the "forbidden comparisons" that bias two-way fixed-effects estimators when effects are heterogeneous. This paper studies the covariate-conditional version of that object, tau_{g,t}(x), and estimates it with a fixed-effects causal forest. Within each (g,t) comparison block, the outcome and treatment are…

未知干扰存在时的双重差分AI 解读

The stable unit treatment value (SUTVA) is a crucial assumption in the Difference-in-Differences (DiD) research design. It rules out hidden versions of treatment and any sort of interference and spillover effects across units. Even if this is a strong assumption, it has not received much attention from DiD practitioners and, in many cases, it is not even explicitly stated as an assumption, especially the no-interference assumption. In this technical note, we investigate what…

让事件研究图支持诚实推断：因果分析的函数型数据方法AI 解读

Event study plots are the centerpiece of Difference-in-Differences (DiD) analysis, but current plotting methods cannot provide honest causal inference when the parallel trends and/or no-anticipation assumptions fail. We introduce a novel functional data approach to DiD that directly enables honest causal inference via event study plots. Our DiD estimator converges to a Gaussian process in the Banach space of continuous functions, enabling powerful simultaneous confidence…

连续处理随机政策变动下的双重差分AI 解读

Treatment effects of stochastic policy shifts quantify differences in outcomes across counterfactual scenarios with varying treatment distributions. Stochastic policy shifts may be of interest in settings where it is unrealistic or infeasible to deterministically manipulate treatments. In this paper, methods are developed to draw inference about stochastic policy effects under difference-in-differences (DiD) designs with a continuous treatment. The proposed causal estimand…