论文检索

图形化群序贯检验的信息性同时置信区间AI 解读

Test procedures for multiple hypotheses in a group sequential clinical trial that control the family-wise error rate are considered. Several graphical group sequential tests suggested in the literature, which are special cases of Bonferroni-closure tests, are discussed. The focus is on the question of whether to consider at the current stage only the evidence of the current repeated p-value or the evidence over all repeated p-values from the previous stages. A new test…

通过双重随机化推断检验双重差分系数的显著性AI 解读

This article develops a significance test for the Difference-in-Differences (DiD) estimator based on dual-margin randomization, in which both the treatment and time indicators are independently permuted to generate an empirical null distribution of the DiD estimator. We situate the proposal explicitly within the landscape of existing inference methods for the DiD estimator, including OLS-based $t$-tests, heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors, cluster-robust variance…

冰淇淋不会导致溺水：评测大语言模型应对因果推断统计陷阱的能力AI 解读

Reliable causal inference is essential for making decisions in high-stakes areas like medicine, economics, and public policy. However, it remains unclear whether large language models (LLMs) can handle rigorous and trustworthy statistical causal inference. Current benchmarks usually involve simplified tasks. For example, these tasks might only ask LLMs to identify semantic causal relationships or draw conclusions directly from raw data. As a result, models may overlook…

有序结果的因果推断：基于 Copula 的识别、估计与敏感性分析AI 解读

In causal inference with ordinal outcomes, several interpretable estimands are functions of the probability that the potential outcome under one treatment is larger than that under another treatment for the same unit. This probability depends on the joint distribution of both potential outcomes and is generally not identifiable. Existing work has focused on sharp bounds of this probability based on partial identification, but bounds are often too wide to be informative. We…

乘法准工具变量模型AI 解读

We introduce the Multiplicative Quasi-Instrumental Variable (MQIV) model, a framework for causal inference with unmeasured confounding that leverages an instrument that may be imperfectly exogenous. We allow the candidate quasi-instrument to have a direct effect on the outcome not mediated by the treatment, thus violating the standard IV exclusion restriction. We establish nonparametric identification of the population average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) under a…

乘法工具变量模型AI 解读

The instrumental variable (IV) design is a common approach to address hidden confounding bias. For validity, an IV must impact the outcome only through its association with the treatment. In addition, IV identification has required a homogeneity condition such as monotonicity or no unmeasured common effect modifier between the additive effect of the treatment on the outcome, and that of the IV on the treatment. In this work, we introduce the Multiplicative Instrumental…

平行趋势违反时双重差分前匹配的偏差—方差权衡AI 解读

Quasi-experimental causal inference methods have become central in empirical operations management for guiding managerial decisions. Among these, empiricists utilize the Difference-in-Differences (DiD) estimator, which relies on the parallel trends assumption. To improve its plausibility, researchers often match treated and control units before applying DiD, with the intuition that matched groups are more likely to evolve similarly absent treatment. Existing work that…

分布偏移与重叠衰减下的一般目标半参数半监督学习AI 解读

In modern scientific applications, large volumes of covariate data are readily available, while outcome labels are costly, sparse, and often subject to distribution shift. This asymmetry has spurred interest in semi-supervised (SS) learning, but most existing approaches rely on strong assumptions -- such as missing completely at random (MCAR) labeling or strict positivity -- that put substantial limitations on their practical usefulness. In this work, we introduce a general…

人口干预中间接效应与干预变量效应的近端推断AI 解读

Unmeasured confounding, unethical exposure, and ill-defined interventions pose significant challenges to evaluating policy-relevant mediation estimands in medicine and public health. In observational studies involving harmful exposures, the population intervention indirect effect (PIIE) is often more salient than the natural indirect effect, as the latter relies on hypothetical interventions that may be ethically or practically unfeasible. While the PIIE can be identified…

扩展 Wasserstein-GAN 因果分布学习：无密度估计与极小极大最优性AI 解读

Distributional causal inference requires estimating not only average treatment effects but also interventional outcome distributions, including quantiles, tail risks, and policy-dependent uncertainty. As a method for distributional causal inference, generative adversarial network (GAN)-based counterfactual methods are flexible tools for this task. However, these methods have several limitations. First, the objectives of certain techniques do not coincide with the statistical…

分布合成控制的渐近性质AI 解读

As an alternative to synthetic control, the distributional Synthetic Control (DSC) proposed by Gunsilius (2023) provides estimates for quantile treatment effect and thus enabling researchers to comprehensively understand the impact of interventions in causal inference. But the asymptotic properties of DSC have not been built. In this paper, we first establish the DSC estimator's asymptotic optimality in the essence that the treatment effect estimator given by DSC achieves…

两类代理变量因果识别方法的比较AI 解读

Identifying causal effects in the presence of unmeasured variables is a fundamental challenge in causal inference, for which proxy variable methods have emerged as a powerful solution. We contrast two major approaches in this framework: (1) bridge equation methods, which leverage solutions to integral equations to recover causal targets, and (2) array decomposition methods, which recover latent factors used to identify counterfactual quantities via eigendecomposition tasks.…

基于 e 值的序贯随机化检验及试验监测AI 解读

Sequential monitoring of randomized trials traditionally relies on parametric assumptions or asymptotic approximations. We discuss a family of nonparametric sequential tests - collectively called e-RT - for binary, event-only, and continuous endpoints. All active variants derive validity from the randomization mechanism. Using a betting framework, each test constructs a test martingale by sequentially wagering on randomized assignments or observed event labels before using…

匹配观察研究中效应修饰的自适应发现AI 解读

Understanding effect modification -- how treatment effects vary across subpopulations -- is practically important in observational studies, as it helps identify which subgroups are likely to benefit from a given treatment. In this paper, we study the discovery of effect modification in matched observational studies, where each treated unit may be matched to multiple controls. We develop a finite-sample valid procedure for identifying and selecting covariate-interpretable…

量化预测中的风险—收益权衡AI 解读

Average forecast accuracy is not the same as forecast reliability. I treat forecast loss differentials relative to a benchmark as a return series. I then evaluate these returns using risk-adjusted performance measures from finance, including the Sharpe ratio, Sortino ratio, Omega ratio, and drawdown-based metrics. I also introduce the Edge Ratio capturing a model's propensity to deliver uniquely informative predictions relative to the forecasting frontier. I apply this…

近端路径特定效应推断AI 解读

Causal mediation analysis has been extended to estimate path-specific effects with multiple intermediate variables, isolating treatment effects through a mediator of interest while excluding pathways through its ancestors. Such analyses address bias from recanting witnesses, i.e., treatment-induced mediator-outcome confounders. However, existing methods typically rely on stringent assumptions precluding general unmeasured confounding, which are often violated in practice. In…

因果发现应拥抱群体智慧AI 解读

This paper argues for recognizing an emerging paradigm of causal learning by wisdom of the crowd. Recent developments in government, industry, and research point to the rise of decentralized and crowd-based approaches within causal modeling, where causal knowledge distributed across many contributors can be systematically elicited and integrated with causal learning workflows. In this paradigm, causal learning becomes a distributed decision-making problem: each participant…

可迁移分位数处理效应的嵌套敏感性包络AI 解读

We study target-population quantile treatment effects when a source study may have unmeasured treatment confounding and may not transport to a target population after conditioning on observed covariates. The observed data consist of a source sample with treatment, outcome and covariates, and a target sample with covariates only. We impose two marginal sensitivity restrictions: an odds-ratio bound \(\Gam\) for source treatment assignment and a conditional likelihood-ratio…

从异质性效应中提取机制：中介分析的识别策略AI 解读

Understanding causal mechanisms is crucial for explaining and generalizing empirical phenomena. Causal mediation analysis offers statistical techniques to quantify the mediation effects. Although numerous methods have been developed for causal inference more broadly, the methodological toolkit for causal mediation analysis remains limited. Current methods often require multiple ignorability assumptions or sophisticated research designs. In this paper, we introduce an…

检验双重差分平行趋势违背时的有效推断AI 解读

The difference-in-differences (DID) research design is a key identification strategy which allows researchers to estimate causal effects under the parallel trends assumption. While the parallel trends assumption is counterfactual and cannot be tested directly, researchers often examine pre-treatment periods to check whether the time trends are parallel before treatment is administered. A recent literature has shown that existing preliminary tests have adverse effects on…

只拟合一次 CATE：无需样本分割的模型辅助随机化检验AI 解读

Randomization tests and flexible treatment-effect models offer complementary strengths for analyzing data from randomized panel experiments: the former provide valid inference under the known assignment mechanism, while the latter can capture complex patterns of effect heterogeneity. We develop model-assisted randomization tests that combine these strengths without sample splitting. The key idea is to estimate an unsigned version of the conditional average treatment effect…

网络依赖与干扰下双重差分的高效非参数估计AI 解读

Differences-in-differences (DiD) is a causal inference method for observational longitudinal data that assumes parallel expected potential outcome trajectories between treatment groups under the counterfactual scenario where all units receive a specific treatment. In this paper DiD is extended to allow for: (i) non-identically distributed treatment effects and exposure probabilities; (ii) interference, where treatment of one unit can affect outcomes in neighboring units; and…

现代异质性稳健双重差分估计量的基于设计方差估计AI 解读

Modern heterogeneity-robust difference-in-differences estimators derive their asymptotic properties under iid, cluster, or fixed-design frameworks that abstract from complex survey sampling, yet practitioners routinely apply them to nationally representative surveys with stratified cluster designs. We show that, under standard regularity conditions, the influence functions of each smooth IF-based or regression-based modern DiD estimator satisfy Binder's (1983) smoothness…

通过有限观测信息汇总界定处理效应AI 解读

We provide novel bounds on average treatment effects (on the treated) that are valid under an unconfoundedness assumption. Our bounds are designed to be robust in challenging situations, for example, when the conditioning variables take on a large number of different values in the observed sample, or when the overlap condition is violated. This robustness is achieved by only using limited "pooling" of information across observations. Namely, the bounds are constructed as…