跳到正文
收录说明
收录范围
保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础,以及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。书评、刊务及明确无关内容不公开;身份或相关性证据不足的记录保留待核,补充可靠材料后可重新判断。
预印本来自 arXiv 计量经济学及相关统计、金融分类和主题检索。主题检索从 2021 年起回补;关注作者追溯更早年份,部分历史文献按已核验编号补录。收录不表示通过同行评审,仍可能遗漏。
本库首次提交范围:2004-06-23 — 2026-10-20。
阅读范围
默认显示本库全部预印本。可选“优先阅读”:至少一位作者同时满足有可核验的本站覆盖期刊正式发表记录,且 OpenAlex 总引用超过 1,000 次。按同一作者身份匹配,两项缺一不可。此筛选提供阅读线索,不作为论文质量判断。
日期与排序
默认按最近修订排序;年份和日期筛选使用首次提交时间。同一 arXiv 编号的修订会合并。仅有月份或年份时,日期区间相交也会纳入。

日期精度:到日 5184 篇 · 到月 0 篇 · 到年 0 篇

分类与引用
领域和方法依据题名、摘要初步分类,可人工修正;分类不代表论文质量。引用数采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本。
因果推断:处理效应、政策评估与因果设计。
更新与 AI 解读
正常题录、可靠摘要与引用同步继续;日、周、月简报按核实的发表与修订日期汇总,历史补录保留在文献库。AI 解读依据可靠摘要或已核实原文片段,已有解读保留供阅读参考;缺少可靠材料的条目保持待解读,浏览页面不会触发生成。
5,184 篇论文
导出
BibTeX ↓RIS ↓RSS 订阅 ↗

Variance estimation after matching or re-weighting

匹配或重新加权后的方差估计

This paper develops a variance estimation framework for matching estimators that enables valid population inference for treatment effects. We provide theoretical analysis of a variance estimator that addresses key limitations in the existing literature. While Abadie and Imbens (2006) proposed a foundational variance estimator requiring matching for both treatment and control groups, this approach is computationally prohibitive and rarely used in practice. Our method provides…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Nonparametric estimation of an optimal treatment rule with fused randomized trials and missing effect modifiers

融合随机试验且效应修饰变量缺失时最优治疗规则的非参数估计

A fundamental principle of clinical medicine is that a treatment should only be administered to those patients who would benefit from it. Treatment strategies that assign treatment to patients as a function of their individual characteristics are known as dynamic treatment rules. The dynamic treatment rule that optimizes the outcome in the population is called the optimal dynamic treatment rule. Randomized clinical trials are considered the gold standard for estimating the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Testing Generalizability in Causal Inference

因果推断中的泛化能力检验

Ensuring robust model performance in diverse real-world scenarios requires addressing generalizability across domains with covariate shifts. However, no formal procedure exists for statistically evaluating generalizability in machine learning algorithms. Existing predictive metrics like mean squared error (MSE) help to quantify the relative performance between models, but do not directly answer whether a model can or cannot generalize. To address this gap in the domain of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Are you doing better than random guessing? A call for using negative controls when evaluating causal discovery algorithms

因果发现优于随机猜测吗?评估算法时使用负对照

New proposals for causal discovery algorithms are typically evaluated using simulations and a few selected real data examples with known data generating mechanisms. However, there does not exist a general guideline for how such evaluation studies should be designed, and therefore, comparing results across different studies can be difficult. In this article, we propose to use negative controls as a common evaluation baseline by posing the question: Are we doing better than…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Sharp Bounds for Continuous-Valued Treatment Effects with Unobserved Confounders

存在未观测混杂时连续处理效应的锐界

In causal inference, treatment effects are typically estimated under the ignorability, or unconfoundedness, assumption, which is often unrealistic in observational data. By relaxing this assumption and conducting a sensitivity analysis, we introduce novel bounds and derive confidence intervals for the Average Potential Outcome (APO) - a standard metric for evaluating continuous-valued treatment or exposure effects. We demonstrate that these bounds are sharp under a…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A note on the properties of the confidence set for the local average treatment effect obtained by inverting the score test

反演得分检验得到的局部平均处理效应置信集性质

We study the properties of the score confidence set for the local average treatment effect in non and semiparametric instrumental variable models. This confidence set is constructed by inverting a score test based on an estimate of the nonparametric influence function for the estimand, and is known to be uniformly valid in models that allow for arbitrarily weak instruments; because of this, the confidence set can have infinite diameter at some laws. We characterize the six…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Conditional Triple Difference-in-Differences

条件三重差分法

Triple difference-in-differences designs are widely used to estimate causal effects in empirical work. Surveying the literature, we find that most applications include controls. We show that this standard practice is generally biased for the target causal estimand when covariate distributions differ across groups. To address this, we propose identifying a causal estimand by fixing the covariate distribution to that of one group. We then develop a double-robust estimator and…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Causal effects on non-terminal event time with application to antibiotic usage and future resistance

非终末事件时间的因果效应:抗生素使用与未来耐药性

Comparing future antibiotic resistance levels resulting from different antibiotic treatments is challenging because some patients may survive only under one of the antibiotic treatments. We embed this problem within a semi-competing risks approach to study the causal effect on resistant infection, treated as a non-terminal event time. We argue that existing principal stratification estimands for such problems exclude patients for whom a causal effect is well-defined and is…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Fisher's Randomization Test for Causality with General Types of Treatments

适用于一般处理类型的 Fisher 因果随机化检验

We extend Fisher's randomization test (FRT) to test conditional independence between observed outcomes and treatments given covariates in both randomized experiments and observational studies, with no restriction on the variable type of treatments. Under a generalized unconfoundedness assumption, we provide causal identification for this hypothesis. Our approach requires neither the no-interference nor the positive overlap assumption, making it a widely applicable tool for…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Longitudinal weighted and trimmed treatment effects with flip interventions

基于翻转干预的纵向加权与修剪处理效应

Weighting and trimming are popular methods for addressing positivity violations in causal inference. While well-studied with single-timepoint data, standard methods do not easily generalize to address non-baseline positivity violations in longitudinal data, and remain vulnerable to such violations. In this paper, we extend weighting and trimming to longitudinal data via stochastic ``flip'' interventions, which maintain the treatment status of subjects who would have received…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Fragility in Average Treatment Effect on the Treated under Limited Covariate Support

协变量支持有限时已处理者平均处理效应的脆弱性

This paper studies the identification of the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) under unconfoundedness when covariate overlap is partial. A formal diagnostic is proposed to characterize empirical support -- the subset of the covariate space where ATT is point-identified due to the presence of comparable untreated units. Where support is absent, standard estimators remain computable but cease to identify meaningful causal parameters. A general sensitivity framework…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Quantifying Treatment Effects: Estimating Risk Ratios in Causal Inference

量化处理效应:因果推断中的风险比估计

Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) are the current gold standards to empirically measure the effect of a new drug. However, they may be of limited size and resorting to complementary non-randomized data, referred to as observational, is promising, as additional sources of evidence. In both RCT and observational data, the Risk Difference (RD) is often used to characterize the effect of a drug. Additionally, medical guidelines recommend to also report the Risk Ratio (RR),…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Distinguishing Cause from Effect with Causal Velocity Models

利用因果速度模型区分原因与结果

Bivariate structural causal models (SCM) are often used to infer causal direction by examining their goodness-of-fit under restricted model classes. In this paper, we describe a parametrization of bivariate SCMs in terms of a causal velocity by viewing the cause variable as time in a dynamical system. The velocity implicitly defines counterfactual curves via the solution of initial value problems where the observation specifies the initial condition. Using tools from measure…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A structural nested rate model for estimating the effects of time-varying exposure on recurrent event outcomes in the presence of death

死亡存在时估计时变暴露对复发事件影响的结构嵌套率模型

Assessing the causal effect of time-varying exposures on recurrent event processes is challenging in the presence of a terminating event. Our objective is to estimate both the short-term and delayed marginal causal effects of exposures on recurrent events while addressing the bias of a potentially correlated terminal event. Existing estimators based on marginal structural models and proportional rate models are unsuitable for estimating delayed marginal causal effects for…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Randomization-Based Method for Evaluating Time-Varying Treatment Effects

评价时变处理效应的随机化方法

Tests for paired censored outcomes have been extensively studied, with some justified in the context of randomization-based inference. These tests are primarily designed to detect an overall treatment effect across the entire follow-up period, providing limited insight into when the effect manifests and how it changes over time. In this article, we introduce new randomization-based tests for paired censored outcomes that enable both time-specific and long-term analysis of a…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Forests for Differences: Robust Causal Inference Beyond Parametric DiD

用于双重差分的森林:超越参数模型的因果推断

This paper introduces the Difference-in-Differences Bayesian Causal Forest (DiD-BCF), a novel non-parametric model addressing key challenges in DiD estimation, such as staggered adoption and heterogeneous treatment effects. DiD-BCF provides a unified framework for estimating Average (ATE), Group-Average (GATE), and Conditional Average Treatment Effects (CATE). A core innovation, its Parallel Trends Assumption (PTA)-based reparameterization, enhances estimation accuracy and…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Individual Treatment Effect: Prediction Intervals and Sharp Bounds

个体处理效应的预测区间与锐界

Individual treatment effect (ITE) is often regarded as the ideal target of inference in causal analyses and has been the focus of several recent studies. In this paper, we describe the intrinsic limits regarding what can be learned concerning ITEs given data from large randomized experiments. We consider when a valid prediction interval for the ITE is informative and when it can be bounded away from zero. The joint distribution over potential outcomes is only partially…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Integrating tumor burden with survival outcome for treatment effect evaluation in oncology trials

结合肿瘤负荷与生存结局评价肿瘤试验处理效应

In early-phase cancer clinical trials, the limited availability of data presents significant challenges in developing a framework to efficiently quantify treatment effectiveness. To address this, we propose a novel utility-based Bayesian approach for assessing treatment effects in these trials, where data scarcity is a major concern. Our approach synthesizes tumor burden, a key biomarker for evaluating patient response to oncology treatments, and survival outcome, a widely…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Using Forests in Multivariate Regression Discontinuity Designs

多评分断点回归设计中的森林方法

We discuss estimation and inference of conditional treatment effects in regression discontinuity (RD) designs with multiple scores. In addition to local linear regressions and the minimax-optimal estimator more recently proposed by Imbens and Wager (2019), we argue that two variants of random forests, honest regression forests and local linear forests, should be added to the toolkit of applied researchers working with multivariate RD designs; their validity follows from…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Debiased regression adjustment in completely randomized experiments with moderately high-dimensional covariates

中等高维协变量下完全随机实验的去偏回归调整

Completely randomized experiment is the gold standard for causal inference. When the covariate information for each experimental candidate is available, one typical way is to include them in covariate adjustments for more accurate treatment effect estimation. In this paper, we investigate this problem under the randomization-based framework, i.e., that the covariates and potential outcomes of all experimental candidates are assumed as deterministic quantities and the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Quantile-Optimal Policy Learning under Unmeasured Confounding

未观测混杂下的分位数最优政策学习

We study quantile-optimal policy learning where the goal is to find a policy whose reward distribution has the largest $α$-quantile for some $α\in (0, 1)$. We focus on the offline setting whose generating process involves unobserved confounders. Such a problem suffers from three main challenges: (i) nonlinearity of the quantile objective as a functional of the reward distribution, (ii) unobserved confounding issue, and (iii) insufficient coverage of the offline dataset. To…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Structure-agnostic Optimality of Doubly Robust Learning for Treatment Effect Estimation

处理效应估计中双重稳健学习的结构无关最优性

Average treatment effect estimation is the most central problem in causal inference with application to numerous disciplines. While many estimation strategies have been proposed in the literature, the statistical optimality of these methods has still remained an open area of investigation, especially in regimes where these methods do not achieve parametric rates. In this paper, we adopt the recently introduced structure-agnostic framework of statistical lower bounds, which…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Automatic Doubly Robust Forests

自动双重稳健随机森林

This paper proposes the automatic Doubly Robust Random Forest (DRRF) algorithm for estimating the conditional expectation of a moment functional in the presence of high-dimensional nuisance functions. DRRF extends the automatic debiasing framework based on the Riesz representer to the conditional setting and enables nonparametric, forest-based estimation (Athey et al., 2019; Oprescu et al., 2019). In contrast to existing methods, DRRF does not require prior knowledge of the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

The Fundamental Limits of Structure-Agnostic Functional Estimation

不依赖结构的泛函估计之基本极限

Many recent developments in causal inference, and functional estimation problems more generally, have been motivated by the fact that classical one-step (first-order) debiasing methods, or their more recent sample-split double machine-learning avatars, can outperform plugin estimators under surprisingly weak conditions. These first-order corrections improve on plugin estimators in a black-box fashion, and consequently are often used in conjunction with powerful off-the-shelf…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓