论文检索

协变量平衡的再随机化如何缓解回归调整中的显著性操纵AI 解读

Rerandomization enforces covariate balance across treatment groups in the design stage of experiments. Despite its intuitive appeal, its theoretical justification remains unsatisfying because its benefits of improving efficiency for estimating the average treatment effect diminish if we use regression adjustment in the analysis stage. To strengthen the theory of rerandomization, we show that it mitigates false discoveries resulting from $p$-hacking caused by strategically…

机器学习辅助协变量调整的设计型边层面因果推断AI 解读

We study design-based causal inference for edge-level outcomes in directed networks under dyadic interference. In this setting, outcomes are defined on directed edges and depend on the joint treatment assignments of pairs of units, inducing a complex dependence structure that invalidates standard estimation and inference procedures developed for node-level data. We construct Horvitz--Thompson estimators for a general class of edge-level causal effects and establish their…

因果推断的设计型理论AI 解读

Causal inference, as a major research area in statistics and data science, plays a central role across diverse fields such as medicine, economics, education, and the social sciences. Design-based causal inference begins with randomized experiments and emphasizes conducting statistical inference by leveraging the known randomization mechanism, thereby enabling identification and estimation of causal effects under weak model dependence. Grounded in the seminal works of Fisher…

随机实验中实现无偏机器学习协变量调整的条件交叉拟合AI 解读

Randomized experiments are the gold standard for estimating the average treatment effect (ATE). While covariate adjustment can reduce the asymptotic variances of the unbiased Horvitz-Thompson estimators for the ATE, it suffers from finite-sample biases due to data reuse in both prediction and estimation. Traditional sample-splitting and cross-fitting methods can address the problem of data reuse and obtain unbiased estimators. However, they require that the data are…

中等高维协变量下完全随机实验的去偏回归调整AI 解读

Completely randomized experiment is the gold standard for causal inference. When the covariate information for each experimental candidate is available, one typical way is to include them in covariate adjustments for more accurate treatment effect estimation. In this paper, we investigate this problem under the randomization-based framework, i.e., that the covariates and potential outcomes of all experimental candidates are assumed as deterministic quantities and the…

近似邻域干扰下的辅助变量调整AI 解读

Randomized experiments are the gold standard for causal inference. However, traditional assumptions, such as the Stable Unit Treatment Value Assumption (SUTVA), often fail in real-world settings where interference between units is present. Network interference, in particular, has garnered significant attention. Structural models, like the linear-in-means model, are commonly used to describe interference; but they rely on the correct specification of the model, which can be…

异质加性处理效应模型下平均处理效应的估计与推断AI 解读

Randomized experiments are the gold standard for estimating treatment effects, yet network interference challenges the validity of traditional estimators by violating the stable unit treatment value assumption and introducing bias. While cluster randomized experiments mitigate this bias, they encounter limitations in handling network complexity and fail to distinguish between direct and indirect effects. To address these challenges, we develop a design-based asymptotic…

随机实验中的“少数者支配”回归调整AI 解读

Regression adjustment is widely used for the analysis of randomized experiments to improve the estimation efficiency of the treatment effect. This paper reexamines a weighted regression adjustment method termed as tyranny-of-the-minority (ToM), wherein units in the minority group are given greater weights. We demonstrate that the ToM regression adjustment is more robust than Lin 2013's regression adjustment with treatment-covariate interactions, even though these two…