跳到正文
收录说明
收录范围
保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础,以及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。书评、刊务及明确无关内容不公开;身份或相关性证据不足的记录保留待核,补充可靠材料后可重新判断。
预印本来自 arXiv 计量经济学及相关统计、金融分类和主题检索。主题检索从 2021 年起回补;关注作者追溯更早年份,部分历史文献按已核验编号补录。收录不表示通过同行评审,仍可能遗漏。
本库首次提交范围:2004-06-23 — 2026-10-14。
阅读范围
默认显示本库全部预印本。可选“优先阅读”:至少一位作者同时满足有可核验的本站覆盖期刊正式发表记录,且 OpenAlex 总引用超过 1,000 次。按同一作者身份匹配,两项缺一不可。此筛选提供阅读线索,不作为论文质量判断。
日期与排序
默认按最近修订排序;年份和日期筛选使用首次提交时间。同一 arXiv 编号的修订会合并。仅有月份或年份时,日期区间相交也会纳入。

日期精度:到日 44 篇 · 到月 0 篇 · 到年 0 篇

分类与引用
领域和方法依据题名、摘要初步分类,可人工修正;分类不代表论文质量。引用数采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本。
更新与 AI 解读
正常题录、可靠摘要与引用同步继续;日、周、月简报按核实的发表与修订日期汇总,历史补录保留在文献库。AI 解读依据可靠摘要或已核实原文片段,已有解读保留供阅读参考;缺少可靠材料的条目保持待解读,浏览页面不会触发生成。
44 篇论文
导出

Estimating Causal Effects from Data Generated by Stochastic Algorithms

利用随机算法生成的数据估计因果效应

Recommendation systems and chatbots present content to users, typically using stochastic algorithms that select the content based on user characteristics or context. Examples of content include chat responses, videos, or items available for purchase. Scientists and application developers are often interested in whether characteristics of content increase outcomes such as user engagement. Estimates of such causal effects may guide content providers to generate content that…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Triply Robust Panel Estimators

三重稳健面板估计量

This paper studies estimation of causal effects in a panel data setting. We introduce a new estimator, the Triply RObust Panel (TROP) estimator, that combines (i) a flexible model for the potential outcomes based on a low-rank factor structure on top of a two-way-fixed effect specification, with (ii) unit weights intended to upweight units similar to the treated units and (iii) time weights intended to upweight time periods close to the treated time periods. We study the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Estimating Variances for Causal Panel Data Estimators

因果面板估计量的方差估计

There has been a recent surge in research on causal panel data models, leading to many new estimators for average causal effects. However, researchers have paid less attention to quantifying the precision of these estimators. This paper addresses that gap by studying the problem of variance estimation in causal panel settings. We develop a unified framework for comparing the three main variance estimators used in these settings: regression-based, Unit-Placebo, and…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Cross-Validated Causal Inference: a Modern Method to Combine Experimental and Observational Data

交叉验证因果推断:结合实验与观察数据的方法

We develop new methods to integrate experimental and observational data in causal inference. While randomized controlled trials offer strong internal validity, they are often costly and therefore limited in sample size. Observational data, though cheaper and often with larger sample sizes, are prone to biases due to unmeasured confounders. To harness their complementary strengths, we propose a systematic framework that formulates causal estimation as an empirical risk…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Using Experiments to Correct for Selection in Observational Studies

利用实验纠正观察性研究中的选择偏差

Researchers increasingly have access to two types of data: (i) large observational datasets where treatment (e.g., class size) is not randomized but several primary outcomes (e.g., graduation rates) and secondary outcomes (e.g., test scores) are observed and (ii) experimental data in which treatment is randomized but only secondary outcomes are observed. We develop a new method to estimate treatment effects on primary outcomes in such settings. We use the difference between…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Identification of Average Treatment Effects in Nonparametric Panel Models

非参数面板模型中平均处理效应的识别

This paper studies identification of average treatment effects in a panel data setting. It introduces a novel nonparametric factor model and proves identification of average treatment effects. The identification proof is based on the introduction of a consistent estimator. Underlying the proof is a result that there is a consistent estimator for the expected outcome in the absence of the treatment for each unit and time period; this result can be applied more broadly, for…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Qini Curves for Multi-Armed Treatment Rules

多臂处理规则的 Qini 曲线

Qini curves have emerged as an attractive and popular approach for evaluating the benefit of data-driven targeting rules for treatment allocation. We propose a generalization of the Qini curve to multiple costly treatment arms, that quantifies the value of optimally selecting among both units and treatment arms at different budget levels. We develop an efficient algorithm for computing these curves and propose bootstrap-based confidence intervals that are exact in large…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Federated Offline Policy Learning

联邦离线策略学习

We consider the problem of learning personalized decision policies from observational bandit feedback data across multiple heterogeneous data sources. In our approach, we introduce a novel regret analysis that establishes finite-sample upper bounds on distinguishing notions of global regret for all data sources on aggregate and of local regret for any given data source. We characterize these regret bounds by expressions of source heterogeneity and distribution shift.…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Robust Offline Policy Learning with Observational Data from Multiple Sources

利用多来源观察数据开展鲁棒离线策略学习

We consider the problem of using observational bandit feedback data from multiple heterogeneous data sources to learn a personalized decision policy that robustly generalizes across diverse target settings. To achieve this, we propose a minimax regret optimization objective to ensure uniformly low regret under general mixtures of the source distributions. We develop a policy learning algorithm tailored to this objective, combining doubly robust offline policy evaluation…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Estimating Treatment Effects using Multiple Surrogates: The Role of the Surrogate Score and the Surrogate Index

利用多个替代指标估计处理效应:替代得分与替代指数

Estimating the long-term effects of treatments is of interest in many fields. A common challenge in estimating such treatment effects is that long-term outcomes are unobserved in the time frame needed to make policy decisions. One approach to overcome this missing data problem is to analyze treatments effects on an intermediate outcome, often called a statistical surrogate, if it satisfies the condition that treatment and outcome are independent conditional on the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Machine Learning Who to Nudge: Causal vs Predictive Targeting in a Field Experiment on Student Financial Aid Renewal

用机器学习选择助推对象:学生助学金续申请实验中的因果与预测定向

In many settings, interventions may be more effective for some individuals than others, so that targeting interventions may be beneficial. We analyze the value of targeting in the context of a large-scale field experiment with over 53,000 college students, where the goal was to use "nudges" to encourage students to renew their financial-aid applications before a non-binding deadline. We begin with baseline approaches to targeting. First, we target based on a causal forest…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Optimal Experimental Design for Staggered Rollouts

分期推行处理的最优实验设计

In this paper, we study the design and analysis of experiments conducted on a set of units over multiple time periods where the starting time of the treatment may vary by unit. The design problem involves selecting an initial treatment time for each unit in order to most precisely estimate both the instantaneous and cumulative effects of the treatment. We first consider non-adaptive experiments, where all treatment assignment decisions are made prior to the start of the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Semiparametric Estimation of Treatment Effects in Randomized Experiments

随机实验中处理效应的半参数估计

We develop new semiparametric methods for estimating treatment effects. We focus on settings where the outcome distributions may be thick tailed, where treatment effects may be small, where sample sizes are large and where assignment is completely random. This setting is of particular interest in recent online experimentation. We propose using parametric models for the treatment effects, leading to semiparametric models for the outcome distributions. We derive the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Counterfactual Inference for Consumer Choice Across Many Product Categories

跨多产品类别消费者选择的反事实推断

This paper proposes a method for estimating consumer preferences among discrete choices, where the consumer chooses at most one product in a category, but selects from multiple categories in parallel. The consumer's utility is additive in the different categories. Her preferences about product attributes as well as her price sensitivity vary across products and are in general correlated across products. We build on techniques from the machine learning literature on…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Federated Causal Inference in Heterogeneous Observational Data

异质性观察数据中的联邦因果推断

We are interested in estimating the effect of a treatment applied to individuals at multiple sites, where data is stored locally for each site. Due to privacy constraints, individual-level data cannot be shared across sites; the sites may also have heterogeneous populations and treatment assignment mechanisms. Motivated by these considerations, we develop federated methods to draw inference on the average treatment effects of combined data across sites. Our methods first…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Flexible and Efficient Contextual Bandits with Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Oracles

借助异质性处理效应估计器构建灵活高效的情境老虎机算法

Contextual bandit algorithms often estimate reward models to inform decision-making. However, true rewards can contain action-independent redundancies that are not relevant for decision-making. We show it is more data-efficient to estimate any function that explains the reward differences between actions, that is, the treatment effects. Motivated by this observation, building on recent work on oracle-based bandit algorithms, we provide the first reduction of contextual…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Synthetic Difference In Differences Estimation

合成双重差分估计的 Stata 实现

In this paper, we describe a computational implementation of the Synthetic difference-in-differences (SDID) estimator of Arkhangelsky et al. (2021) for Stata. Synthetic difference-in-differences can be used in a wide class of circumstances where treatment effects on some particular policy or event are desired, and repeated observations on treated and untreated units are available over time. We lay out the theory underlying SDID, both when there is a single treatment adoption…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Contextual Bandits in a Survey Experiment on Charitable Giving: Within-Experiment Outcomes versus Policy Learning

慈善捐赠调查中的情境老虎机:实验内结果与政策学习

We design and implement an adaptive experiment (a ``contextual bandit'') to learn a targeted treatment assignment policy, where the goal is to use a participant's survey responses to determine which charity to expose them to in a donation solicitation. The design balances two competing objectives: optimizing the outcomes for the subjects in the experiment (``cumulative regret minimization'') and gathering data that will be most useful for policy learning, that is, for…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Policy Learning with Adaptively Collected Data

利用自适应收集数据进行政策学习

Learning optimal policies from historical data enables personalization in a wide variety of applications including healthcare, digital recommendations, and online education. The growing policy learning literature focuses on settings where the data collection rule stays fixed throughout the experiment. However, adaptive data collection is becoming more common in practice, from two primary sources: 1) data collected from adaptive experiments that are designed to improve…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

When Should You Adjust Standard Errors for Clustering?

何时应对标准误进行聚类调整?

In empirical work it is common to estimate parameters of models and report associated standard errors that account for "clustering" of units, where clusters are defined by factors such as geography. Clustering adjustments are typically motivated by the concern that unobserved components of outcomes for units within clusters are correlated. However, this motivation does not provide guidance about questions such as: (i) Why should we adjust standard errors for clustering in…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Matrix Completion Methods for Causal Panel Data Models

因果面板数据模型的矩阵补全方法

In this paper we study methods for estimating causal effects in settings with panel data, where some units are exposed to a treatment during some periods and the goal is estimating counterfactual (untreated) outcomes for the treated unit/period combinations. We propose a class of matrix completion estimators that uses the observed elements of the matrix of control outcomes corresponding to untreated unit/periods to impute the "missing" elements of the control outcome matrix,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Synthetic Difference in Differences

合成双重差分

We present a new estimator for causal effects with panel data that builds on insights behind the widely used difference in differences and synthetic control methods. Relative to these methods we find, both theoretically and empirically, that this "synthetic difference in differences" estimator has desirable robustness properties, and that it performs well in settings where the conventional estimators are commonly used in practice. We study the asymptotic behavior of the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Off-Policy Evaluation via Adaptive Weighting with Data from Contextual Bandits

基于上下文老虎机数据自适应加权的离策略评估

It has become increasingly common for data to be collected adaptively, for example using contextual bandits. Historical data of this type can be used to evaluate other treatment assignment policies to guide future innovation or experiments. However, policy evaluation is challenging if the target policy differs from the one used to collect data, and popular estimators, including doubly robust (DR) estimators, can be plagued by bias, excessive variance, or both. In particular,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Confidence Intervals for Policy Evaluation in Adaptive Experiments

自适应实验中政策评估的置信区间

Adaptive experiment designs can dramatically improve statistical efficiency in randomized trials, but they also complicate statistical inference. For example, it is now well known that the sample mean is biased in adaptive trials. Inferential challenges are exacerbated when our parameter of interest differs from the parameter the trial was designed to target, such as when we are interested in estimating the value of a sub-optimal treatment after running a trial to determine…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓