跳到正文
收录说明
收录范围
保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础,以及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。书评、刊务及明确无关内容不公开;身份或相关性证据不足的记录保留待核,补充可靠材料后可重新判断。
预印本来自 arXiv 计量经济学及相关统计、金融分类和主题检索。主题检索从 2021 年起回补;关注作者追溯更早年份,部分历史文献按已核验编号补录。收录不表示通过同行评审,仍可能遗漏。
本库首次提交范围:2004-06-23 — 2026-10-14。
阅读范围
默认显示本库全部预印本。可选“优先阅读”:至少一位作者同时满足有可核验的本站覆盖期刊正式发表记录,且 OpenAlex 总引用超过 1,000 次。按同一作者身份匹配,两项缺一不可。此筛选提供阅读线索,不作为论文质量判断。
日期与排序
默认按最近修订排序;年份和日期筛选使用首次提交时间。同一 arXiv 编号的修订会合并。仅有月份或年份时,日期区间相交也会纳入。

日期精度:到日 10 篇 · 到月 0 篇 · 到年 0 篇

分类与引用
领域和方法依据题名、摘要初步分类,可人工修正;分类不代表论文质量。引用数采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本。
更新与 AI 解读
正常题录、可靠摘要与引用同步继续;日、周、月简报按核实的发表与修订日期汇总,历史补录保留在文献库。AI 解读依据可靠摘要或已核实原文片段,已有解读保留供阅读参考;缺少可靠材料的条目保持待解读,浏览页面不会触发生成。
10 篇论文
导出

Robust Estimation and Inference in Hybrid Controlled Trials for Binary Outcomes: A Case Study on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

二元结果混合对照试验的稳健估计与推断:非小细胞肺癌案例

Hybrid controlled trials (HCTs), which augment randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with external controls (ECs), are increasingly receiving attention as a way to address limited power, slow accrual, and ethical concerns in clinical research. However, borrowing from ECs raises critical statistical challenges in estimation and inference, especially for binary outcomes where hidden bias is harder to detect and estimands such as risk difference, risk ratio, and odds ratio are of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Power and Sample Size Calculations for Hybrid Controlled Trials

混合对照试验的功效与样本量计算

Hybrid controlled trials (HCTs) augment randomized controls with external controls (ECs) to address practical challenges in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and improve statistical power in settings such as rare diseases, oncology, and pediatrics. However, prospective sample-size determination is challenging because the required RCT sample size depends on the comparability of ECs with RCT controls, which are unavailable at the planning stage. We propose a 5+3 design for…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Targeted Data Fusion for Region-Specific Survival Effects in the AMP HIV Prevention Trials

AMP 艾滋病预防试验中地区特异性生存效应的定向数据融合

The Antibody Mediated Prevention (AMP) trials opened a new scientific frontier by showing that passively administered monoclonal broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) could prevent HIV-1 acquisition. Conducted across multiple geographic regions, including the United States, Brazil, Peru, Switzerland, and sub-Saharan Africa, the AMP trials revealed substantial regional heterogeneity in treatment efficacy. These differences, together with privacy and regulatory limits on…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Conformal Selection Framework for Individual Treatment Beneficiaries with Auxiliary External Data

利用辅助外部数据识别治疗受益者的共形筛选框架

Identifying patients who are likely to benefit from a treatment is central to precision medicine and can guide follow-up trials, enrichment designs, and individualized decisions. Although randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide evidence on efficacy, they are usually powered to estimate average treatment effects rather than patient-level benefit. Meanwhile, artificial intelligence and machine learning methods offer flexible tools for estimating heterogeneous treatment…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Selective Information Borrowing for Region-Specific Treatment Effect Inference under Covariate Mismatch in Multi-Regional Clinical Trials

多区域临床试验中协变量不匹配下的区域治疗效应推断

Multi-regional clinical trials (MRCTs) are central to global drug development, enabling evaluation of treatment effects across diverse populations. A key challenge is valid and efficient inference for a region-specific estimand when the target region is small and differs from auxiliary regions in baseline covariates or unmeasured factors. We adopt an estimand-based framework and focus on the region-specific average treatment effect (RSATE) in a prespecified target region,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Design-based theory for causal inference

因果推断的设计型理论

Causal inference, as a major research area in statistics and data science, plays a central role across diverse fields such as medicine, economics, education, and the social sciences. Design-based causal inference begins with randomized experiments and emphasizes conducting statistical inference by leveraging the known randomization mechanism, thereby enabling identification and estimation of causal effects under weak model dependence. Grounded in the seminal works of Fisher…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

COADVISE: Covariate Adjustment with Variable Selection in Randomized Controlled Trials

COADVISE:随机对照试验中结合变量选择的协变量调整

Adjusting for covariates in randomized controlled trials can enhance the credibility and efficiency of treatment effect estimation. However, handling numerous covariates and their complex (non-linear) transformations poses a challenge. Motivated by the case study of the Best Apnea Interventions for Research (BestAIR) trial data from the National Sleep Research Resource (NSRR), where the number of covariates (p=114) is comparable to the sample size (N=196), we propose a…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Sharp variance estimator and causal bootstrap in stratified randomized experiments

分层随机实验中的锐方差估计与因果自助法

Randomized experiments are the gold standard for estimating treatment effects, and randomization serves as a reasoned basis for inference. In widely used stratified randomized experiments, randomization-based finite-population asymptotic theory enables valid inference for the average treatment effect, relying on normal approximation and a Neyman-type conservative variance estimator. However, when the sample size is small or the outcomes are skewed, the Neyman-type variance…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Design-based theory for Lasso adjustment in randomized block experiments and rerandomized experiments

随机区组与再随机化实验中 Lasso 调整的设计型理论

Blocking, a special case of rerandomization, is routinely implemented in the design stage of randomized experiments to balance the baseline covariates. This study proposes a regression adjustment method based on the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) to efficiently estimate the average treatment effect in randomized block experiments with high-dimensional covariates. We derive the asymptotic properties of the proposed estimator and outline the conditions…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Inference for the panel ARMA-GARCH model when both $N$ and $T$ are large

个体数与时间长度均较大时的面板 ARMA-GARCH 模型推断

We propose a panel ARMA-GARCH model to capture the dynamics of large panel data with $N$ individuals over $T$ time periods. For this model, we provide a two-step estimation procedure to estimate the ARMA parameters and GARCH parameters stepwisely. Under some regular conditions, we show that all of the proposed estimators are asymptotically normal with the convergence rate $(NT)^{-1/2}$, and they have the asymptotic biases when both $N$ and $T$ diverge to infinity at the same…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓