跳到正文
收录说明
收录范围
保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础,以及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。书评、刊务及明确无关内容不公开;身份或相关性证据不足的记录保留待核,补充可靠材料后可重新判断。
预印本来自 arXiv 计量经济学及相关统计、金融分类和主题检索。主题检索从 2021 年起回补;关注作者追溯更早年份,部分历史文献按已核验编号补录。收录不表示通过同行评审,仍可能遗漏。
本库首次提交范围:2004-06-23 — 2026-10-15。
阅读范围
默认显示本库全部预印本。可选“优先阅读”:至少一位作者同时满足有可核验的本站覆盖期刊正式发表记录,且 OpenAlex 总引用超过 1,000 次。按同一作者身份匹配,两项缺一不可。此筛选提供阅读线索,不作为论文质量判断。
日期与排序
默认按最近修订排序;年份和日期筛选使用首次提交时间。同一 arXiv 编号的修订会合并。仅有月份或年份时,日期区间相交也会纳入。

日期精度:到日 49 篇 · 到月 0 篇 · 到年 0 篇

分类与引用
领域和方法依据题名、摘要初步分类,可人工修正;分类不代表论文质量。引用数采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本。
更新与 AI 解读
正常题录、可靠摘要与引用同步继续;日、周、月简报按核实的发表与修订日期汇总,历史补录保留在文献库。AI 解读依据可靠摘要或已核实原文片段,已有解读保留供阅读参考;缺少可靠材料的条目保持待解读,浏览页面不会触发生成。
49 篇论文
导出

Double and Single Descent in Causal Inference with an Application to High-Dimensional Synthetic Control

因果推断中的双重下降与单调下降:高维合成控制应用

Motivated by a recent literature on the double-descent phenomenon in machine learning, we consider highly over-parameterized models in causal inference, including synthetic control with many control units. In such models, there may be so many free parameters that the model fits the training data perfectly. We first investigate high-dimensional linear regression for imputing wage data and estimating average treatment effects, where we find that models with many more…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Optimal Experimental Design for Staggered Rollouts

分期推行处理的最优实验设计

In this paper, we study the design and analysis of experiments conducted on a set of units over multiple time periods where the starting time of the treatment may vary by unit. The design problem involves selecting an initial treatment time for each unit in order to most precisely estimate both the instantaneous and cumulative effects of the treatment. We first consider non-adaptive experiments, where all treatment assignment decisions are made prior to the start of the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Fixed Effects and the Generalized Mundlak Estimator

固定效应与广义 Mundlak 估计量

We develop a new approach for estimating average treatment effects in observational studies with unobserved group-level heterogeneity. We consider a general model with group-level unconfoundedness and provide conditions under which aggregate balancing statistics -- group-level averages of functions of treatments and covariates -- are sufficient to eliminate differences between groups. Building on these results, we reinterpret commonly used linear fixed-effect regression…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Design-Based Perspective on Synthetic Control Methods

合成控制方法的设计视角

Since their introduction in Abadie and Gardeazabal (2003), Synthetic Control (SC) methods have quickly become one of the leading methods for estimating causal effects in observational studies in settings with panel data. Formal discussions often motivate SC methods by the assumption that the potential outcomes were generated by a factor model. Here we study SC methods from a design-based perspective, assuming a model for the selection of the treated unit(s) and period(s). We…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Synthetic Difference In Differences Estimation

合成双重差分估计的 Stata 实现

In this paper, we describe a computational implementation of the Synthetic difference-in-differences (SDID) estimator of Arkhangelsky et al. (2021) for Stata. Synthetic difference-in-differences can be used in a wide class of circumstances where treatment effects on some particular policy or event are desired, and repeated observations on treated and untreated units are available over time. We lay out the theory underlying SDID, both when there is a single treatment adoption…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

When Should You Adjust Standard Errors for Clustering?

何时应对标准误进行聚类调整?

In empirical work it is common to estimate parameters of models and report associated standard errors that account for "clustering" of units, where clusters are defined by factors such as geography. Clustering adjustments are typically motivated by the concern that unobserved components of outcomes for units within clusters are correlated. However, this motivation does not provide guidance about questions such as: (i) Why should we adjust standard errors for clustering in…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Matrix Completion Methods for Causal Panel Data Models

因果面板数据模型的矩阵补全方法

In this paper we study methods for estimating causal effects in settings with panel data, where some units are exposed to a treatment during some periods and the goal is estimating counterfactual (untreated) outcomes for the treated unit/period combinations. We propose a class of matrix completion estimators that uses the observed elements of the matrix of control outcomes corresponding to untreated unit/periods to impute the "missing" elements of the control outcome matrix,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Covariate Balancing Sensitivity Analysis for Extrapolating Randomized Trials across Locations

跨地区外推随机试验的协变量平衡敏感性分析

The ability to generalize experimental results from randomized control trials (RCTs) across locations is crucial for informing policy decisions in targeted regions. Such generalization is often hindered by the lack of identifiability due to unmeasured effect modifiers that compromise direct transport of treatment effect estimates from one location to another. We build upon sensitivity analysis in observational studies and propose an optimization procedure that allows us to…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Synthetic Design: An Optimization Approach to Experimental Design with Synthetic Controls

合成设计:利用合成控制优化实验设计

We investigate the optimal design of experimental studies that have pre-treatment outcome data available. The average treatment effect is estimated as the difference between the weighted average outcomes of the treated and control units. A number of commonly used approaches fit this formulation, including the difference-in-means estimator and a variety of synthetic-control techniques. We propose several methods for choosing the set of treated units in conjunction with the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Controlling for Unmeasured Confounding in Panel Data Using Minimal Bridge Functions: From Two-Way Fixed Effects to Factor Models

以最小桥函数控制面板数据中的未观测混杂:从双向固定效应到因子模型

We develop a new approach for identifying and estimating average causal effects in panel data under a linear factor model with unmeasured confounders. Compared to other methods tackling factor models such as synthetic controls and matrix completion, our method does not require the number of time periods to grow infinitely. Instead, we draw inspiration from the two-way fixed effect model as a special case of the linear factor model, where a simple difference-in-differences…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Bayesian Meta-Prior Learning Using Empirical Bayes

利用经验贝叶斯学习贝叶斯元先验

Adding domain knowledge to a learning system is known to improve results. In multi-parameter Bayesian frameworks, such knowledge is incorporated as a prior. On the other hand, various model parameters can have different learning rates in real-world problems, especially with skewed data. Two often-faced challenges in Operation Management and Management Science applications are the absence of informative priors, and the inability to control parameter learning rates. In this…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Using Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks for the Design of Monte Carlo Simulations

利用 Wasserstein 生成对抗网络设计蒙特卡洛模拟

When researchers develop new econometric methods it is common practice to compare the performance of the new methods to those of existing methods in Monte Carlo studies. The credibility of such Monte Carlo studies is often limited because of the freedom the researcher has in choosing the design. In recent years a new class of generative models emerged in the machine learning literature, termed Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) that can be used to systematically generate…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Ensemble Methods for Causal Effects in Panel Data Settings

面板数据因果效应的集成估计方法

This paper studies a panel data setting where the goal is to estimate causal effects of an intervention by predicting the counterfactual values of outcomes for treated units, had they not received the treatment. Several approaches have been proposed for this problem, including regression methods, synthetic control methods and matrix completion methods. This paper considers an ensemble approach, and shows that it performs better than any of the individual methods in several…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Machine Learning Methods Economists Should Know About

经济学家应了解的机器学习方法

We discuss the relevance of the recent Machine Learning (ML) literature for economics and econometrics. First we discuss the differences in goals, methods and settings between the ML literature and the traditional econometrics and statistics literatures. Then we discuss some specific methods from the machine learning literature that we view as important for empirical researchers in economics. These include supervised learning methods for regression and classification,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Causal Bootstrap

因果自助法

The bootstrap, introduced by Efron (1982), has become a very popular method for estimating variances and constructing confidence intervals. A key insight is that one can approximate the properties of estimators by using the empirical distribution function of the sample as an approximation for the true distribution function. This approach views the uncertainty in the estimator as coming exclusively from sampling uncertainty. We argue that for causal estimands the uncertainty…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Estimation Considerations in Contextual Bandits

情境老虎机中的估计问题

Contextual bandit algorithms are sensitive to the estimation method of the outcome model as well as the exploration method used, particularly in the presence of rich heterogeneity or complex outcome models, which can lead to difficult estimation problems along the path of learning. We study a consideration for the exploration vs. exploitation framework that does not arise in multi-armed bandits but is crucial in contextual bandits; the way exploration and exploitation is…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Balanced Linear Contextual Bandits

带平衡调整的线性情境老虎机

Contextual bandit algorithms are sensitive to the estimation method of the outcome model as well as the exploration method used, particularly in the presence of rich heterogeneity or complex outcome models, which can lead to difficult estimation problems along the path of learning. We develop algorithms for contextual bandits with linear payoffs that integrate balancing methods from the causal inference literature in their estimation to make it less prone to problems of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Design-based Analysis in Difference-In-Differences Settings with Staggered Adoption

交错实施双重差分的设计型分析

In this paper we study estimation of and inference for average treatment effects in a setting with panel data. We focus on the setting where units, e.g., individuals, firms, or states, adopt the policy or treatment of interest at a particular point in time, and then remain exposed to this treatment at all times afterwards. We take a design perspective where we investigate the properties of estimators and procedures given assumptions on the assignment process. We show that…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Optimized Regression Discontinuity Designs

优化回归不连续设计

The increasing popularity of regression discontinuity methods for causal inference in observational studies has led to a proliferation of different estimating strategies, most of which involve first fitting non-parametric regression models on both sides of a treatment assignment boundary and then reporting plug-in estimates for the effect of interest. In applications, however, it is often difficult to tune the non-parametric regressions in a way that is well calibrated for…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Estimating Average Treatment Effects: Supplementary Analyses and Remaining Challenges

平均处理效应估计:补充分析与尚存挑战

There is a large literature on semiparametric estimation of average treatment effects under unconfounded treatment assignment in settings with a fixed number of covariates. More recently attention has focused on settings with a large number of covariates. In this paper we extend lessons from the earlier literature to this new setting. We propose that in addition to reporting point estimates and standard errors, researchers report results from a number of supplementary…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Peer Encouragement Designs in Causal Inference with Partial Interference and Identification of Local Average Network Effects

部分干扰下的同伴鼓励设计与局部平均网络效应识别

In non-network settings, encouragement designs have been widely used to analyze causal effects of a treatment, policy, or intervention on an outcome of interest when randomizing the treatment was considered impractical or when compliance to treatment cannot be perfectly enforced. Unfortunately, such questions related to treatment compliance have received less attention in network settings and the most well-studied experimental design in networks, the two-stage randomization…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

The State of Applied Econometrics - Causality and Policy Evaluation

应用计量经济学现状:因果关系与政策评估

In this paper we discuss recent developments in econometrics that we view as important for empirical researchers working on policy evaluation questions. We focus on three main areas, where in each case we highlight recommendations for applied work. First, we discuss new research on identification strategies in program evaluation, with particular focus on synthetic control methods, regression discontinuity, external validity, and the causal interpretation of regression…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

The Econometrics of Randomized Experiments

随机实验的计量经济学方法

In this review, we present econometric and statistical methods for analyzing randomized experiments. For basic experiments we stress randomization-based inference as opposed to sampling-based inference. In randomization-based inference, uncertainty in estimates arises naturally from the random assignment of the treatments, rather than from hypothesized sampling from a large population. We show how this perspective relates to regression analyses for randomized experiments. We…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Recursive Partitioning for Heterogeneous Causal Effects

异质性因果效应的递归划分

In this paper we study the problems of estimating heterogeneity in causal effects in experimental or observational studies and conducting inference about the magnitude of the differences in treatment effects across subsets of the population. In applications, our method provides a data-driven approach to determine which subpopulations have large or small treatment effects and to test hypotheses about the differences in these effects. For experiments, our method allows…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓