论文检索

通过留一变量法交叉验证因果发现AI 解读

We propose a new approach to falsify causal discovery algorithms without ground truth, which is based on testing the causal model on a variable pair excluded during learning the causal model. Specifically, given data on $X, Y, \boldsymbol{Z}=X, Y, Z_1,\dots,Z_k$, we apply the causal discovery algorithm separately to the 'leave-one-out' data sets $X, \boldsymbol{Z}$ and $Y, \boldsymbol{Z}$. We demonstrate that the two resulting causal models, in the form DAGs, ADMGs, CPDAGs…

因果发现中的假设违反与得分匹配的稳健性AI 解读

When domain knowledge is limited and experimentation is restricted by ethical, financial, or time constraints, practitioners turn to observational causal discovery methods to recover the causal structure, exploiting the statistical properties of their data. Because causal discovery without further assumptions is an ill-posed problem, each algorithm comes with its own set of usually untestable assumptions, some of which are hard to meet in real datasets. Motivated by these…

多重稳健的因果变化归因AI 解读

Comparing two samples of data, we observe a change in the distribution of an outcome variable. In the presence of multiple explanatory variables, how much of the change can be explained by each possible cause? We develop a new estimation strategy that, given a causal model, combines regression and re-weighting methods to quantify the contribution of each causal mechanism. Our proposed methodology is multiply robust, meaning that it still recovers the target parameter under…

DoWhy-GCM：用于图因果模型推断的 DoWhy 扩展AI 解读

We present DoWhy-GCM, an extension of the DoWhy Python library, which leverages graphical causal models. Unlike existing causality libraries, which mainly focus on effect estimation, DoWhy-GCM addresses diverse causal queries, such as identifying the root causes of outliers and distributional changes, attributing causal influences to the data generating process of each node, or diagnosis of causal structures. With DoWhy-GCM, users typically specify cause-effect relations via…

自兼容性：在没有真实因果结构时评估因果发现AI 解读

As causal ground truth is incredibly rare, causal discovery algorithms are commonly only evaluated on simulated data. This is concerning, given that simulations reflect preconceptions about generating processes regarding noise distributions, model classes, and more. In this work, we propose a novel method for falsifying the output of a causal discovery algorithm in the absence of ground truth. Our key insight is that while statistical learning seeks stability across subsets…

通过因果边际问题界定致因概率AI 解读

Probabilities of Causation play a fundamental role in decision making in law, health care and public policy. Nevertheless, their point identification is challenging, requiring strong assumptions such as monotonicity. In the absence of such assumptions, existing work requires multiple observations of datasets that contain the same treatment and outcome variables, in order to establish bounds on these probabilities. However, in many clinical trials and public policy evaluation…

现象学因果性AI 解读

Discussions on causal relations in real life often consider variables for which the definition of causality is unclear since the notion of interventions on the respective variables is obscure. Asking 'what qualifies an action for being an intervention on the variable X' raises the question whether the action impacted all other variables only through X or directly, which implicitly refers to a causal model. To avoid this known circularity, we instead suggest a notion of…

线性动态系统中谱独立性因果推断的理论基础AI 解读

Distinguishing between cause and effect using time series observational data is a major challenge in many scientific fields. A new perspective has been provided based on the principle of Independence of Causal Mechanisms (ICM), leading to the Spectral Independence Criterion (SIC), postulating that the power spectral density (PSD) of the cause time series is uncorrelated with the squared modulus of the frequency response of the filter generating the effect. Since SIC rests on…