Data-translated likelihood and Jeifreys's rules
数据平移似然与 Jeffreys 规则AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论似然、辅助统计量与先验选择的一般理论,缺乏所列具体计量应用领域的明确依据。
反馈分类问题数据平移似然与 Jeffreys 规则AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
According to the definition used by Box & Tiao (1973) for a likelihood to be ‘data translated’ it must have location form in terms of a sufficient statistic. In contrast to Jeffreys's arguments for a uniform prior, theirs does not cover cases such as the Cauchy location family, and is in this sense stronger than the group-theoretic criterion of invariance. Their definition is easily modified to cover such cases through the introduction of an ancillary statistic, and their argument in favour of a uniform prior then becomes group-theoretic. Their concept of ‘approximate data-translated likelihood’ may also be modified to produce a sharper local approximation.