跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用高维回归的损失评估,未明确涉及因果、预测或其他所列专门方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
T. Tony Cai
Zijian Guo

高维线性回归估计的精度评估

研究问题
高维随机设计线性回归中,如何估计回归向量估计量的 ℓq 损失,并为该损失构造具有最优长度或适应性的置信区间?
方法与思路
作者分别研究设计协方差和噪声水平已知及未知的情形,建立损失估计与区间长度的极小极大界,并分析适应性。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,文章揭示 ℓ2 与其他所考察 ℓq 损失之间、两类信息设定之间的差异,并提出建立尖锐下界的新技术工具。
阅读关注点
应核对损失定义、参数空间及估计量性能约束,区分回归参数估计难度与损失估计难度,并查看区间适应性的边界。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;具体速率、稀疏性条件和适应性结论未给出,不能据此判断某个估计量的实际误差。

原文摘要

This paper considers point and interval estimation of the $\ell_{q}$ loss of an estimator in high-dimensional linear regression with random design. We establish the minimax rate for estimating the $\ell_{q}$ loss and the minimax expected length of confidence intervals for the $\ell_{q}$ loss of rate-optimal estimators of the regression vector, including commonly used estimators such as Lasso, scaled Lasso, square-root Lasso and Dantzig Selector. Adaptivity of confidence intervals for the $\ell_{q}$ loss is also studied. Both the setting of the known identity design covariance matrix and known noise level and the setting of unknown design covariance matrix and unknown noise level are studied. The results reveal interesting and significant differences between estimating the $\ell_{2}$ loss and $\ell_{q}$ loss with $1\le q<2$ as well as between the two settings. New technical tools are developed to establish rate sharp lower bounds for the minimax estimation error and the expected length of minimax and adaptive confidence intervals for the $\ell_{q}$ loss. A significant difference between loss estimation and the traditional parameter estimation is that for loss estimation the constraint is on the performance of the estimator of the regression vector, but the lower bounds are on the difficulty of estimating its $\ell_{q}$ loss. The technical tools developed in this paper can also be of independent interest.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文