跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:研究对象是数据保密与身份披露风险,所给摘要不足以归入列出的计量领域细分。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者

利用混合隶属度模型估计身份披露风险

研究问题
当离散身份特征形成稀疏列联表时,如何估计样本中唯一的特征组合在总体中也唯一的概率,以评估身份披露风险?
方法与思路
作者提出多项变量的贝叶斯隶属度模型,以MCMC拟合;将美国人口普查公开微观样本视为总体,抽样检验唯一性预测。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,在所考察的抽样比较中,该模型对样本唯一记录总数和记录层面唯一性概率的估计均优于对数线性模型。
阅读关注点
应核对混合隶属度设定、先验与MCMC实现,以及总体构造、稀疏程度和比较指标如何影响记录层面的风险估计。
阅读边界
仅据OpenAlex索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;准确性优势限于摘要描述的比较,未给出数值或适用条件,不能推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

Statistical agencies and other organizations that disseminate data are obligated to protect data subjects' confidentiality. For example, ill-intentioned individuals might link data subjects to records in other databases by matching on common characteristics (keys). Successful links are particularly problematic for data subjects with combinations of keys that are unique in the population. Hence, as part of their assessments of disclosure risks, many data stewards estimate the probabilities that sample uniques on sets of discrete keys are also population uniques on those keys. This is typically done using log-linear modeling on the keys. However, log-linear models can yield biased estimates of cell probabilities for sparse contingency tables with many zero counts, which often occurs in databases with many keys. This bias can result in unreliable estimates of probabilities of uniqueness and, hence, misrepresentations of disclosure risks. We propose an alternative to log-linear models for datasets with sparse keys based on a Bayesian version of grade of membership (GoM) models. We present a Bayesian GoM model for multinomial variables and offer an MCMC algorithm for fitting the model. We evaluate the approach by treating data from a recent US Census Bureau public use microdata sample as a population, taking simple random samples from that population, and benchmarking estimated probabilities of uniqueness against population values. Compared to log-linear models, GoM models provide more accurate estimates of the total number of uniques in the samples. Additionally, they offer record-level predictions of uniqueness that dominate those based on log-linear models.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文