Bias-Aware Confidence Intervals for Synthetic Control via Placebo-in-Time Bootstrap
通过时间安慰剂 Bootstrap 构造考虑偏差的合成控制置信区间AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究合成控制因果效应区间,并利用观测面板与处理前时间安慰剂进行偏差校准。
通过时间安慰剂 Bootstrap 构造考虑偏差的合成控制置信区间AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Synthetic control (SC) methods are among the most widely used tools for causal inference without randomization. The standard Gaussian confidence interval around the estimated effect is simple, fast, and reliably directional when the treatment signal is strong, so practitioners default to it for good reason. Most treated populations, however, are bottom-heavy in intensity, and for them the SC model's systematic bias rivals or exceeds the signal even under good pre-treatment fit. Because this bias shares sign across units it does not average out, and the Gaussian confidence interval shrinks past it and converges on a wrong center. The failure is not imprecision but misdirection: a positive effect estimated as negligible is a missed opportunity, while a negligible effect estimated as significantly positive leads to continued investment in an intervention that is not working. No existing confidence interval for the SC effect measures this bias. We propose a placebo-in-time bootstrap that estimates the bias distribution directly from the observed panel. For each treated unit the procedure backdates the treatment onset and refits the SC model at each placebo onset; the resulting placebo gaps are draws from the same bias distribution that contaminates the real estimate, and bootstrapping them yields a critical value calibrated at the zero null. Because the method resamples realized model error rather than a hypothesized effect, coverage is trajectory-agnostic: it holds at fixed width regardless of how the true effect evolves over time.
双重差分与合成控制的结合:双重稳健识别和估计
Difference-in-Differences (DiD) and Synthetic Control (SC) are widely used methods for causal inference in panel data, each with distinct strengths and limitations. We propose a novel method for short-panel causal inference that integrates the advantages of both approaches. Our method delivers a doubly robust identification strategy for the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) under either of two non-nested assumptions: parallel trends or a group-level SC condition.…
合成双重差分中固定目标集合异质性的共享供体推断
Empirical studies often estimate several synthetic-control or synthetic Difference-in-Differences effects from a common donor pool and then summarize their heterogeneity. Because the same donors enter several comparisons, the first-stage errors are jointly distributed and affect different targets differently. We characterize three regimes for linear fixed-set summaries: nonconcentration, root-rate donor exposure, and donornegligibility. We also show that removing…
高维面板数据中的分位数处理效应
We introduce novel estimators for quantile causal effects with high dimensional panel data (large $N$ and $T$), where only one or a few units are affected by the intervention or policy. Our method extends the generalized synthetic control method \citep{xu_2017} from average treatment effects on the treated to quantile treatment effects on the treated, allowing the underlying factor structure to change across the quantile of the interested outcome distribution. Our method…
交错采用处理的观察性研究中的随机化检验
This article considers the problem of inference in observational studies with time-varying adoption of treatment. In addition to an unconfoundedness assumption that the potential outcomes are independent of the times at which units adopt treatment conditional on the units’ observed characteristics, our analysis assumes that the time at which each unit adopts treatment follows a Cox proportional hazards model. This assumption permits the time at which each unit adopts…
合成控制方法所估平均处理效应的统计推断
The synthetic control (SC) method, a powerful tool for estimating average treatment effects (ATE), is increasingly popular in fields such as statistics, economics, political science, and marketing. The SC is particularly suitable for estimating ATE with a single (or a few) treated unit(s), a fixed number of control units, and large pre and post-treatment periods (which we refer as “long panels”). To date, there has been no formal inference theory for SC ATE estimator with…
平均处理效应局部化:合成控制中的投影方法
Many real-world policies and business interventions require assessing short-term effects to inform timely decisions, even though most causal inference methods focus on long-term average treatment effects. In this article, we introduce average treatment effect localization (ATEL), which captures localized, short-term policy impacts in panel data settings with a single treated unit and provides early indicators of policy impact. To accommodate both time-varying and nonlinear…