跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要在潜在结果框架下估计平均处理效应,并结合倾向得分、结果模型与双重稳健方法。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Kaoru Babasaki
Shonosuke Sugasawa
Kosaku Takanashi
Kenichiro McAlinn

通过回归合成开展集成双重稳健贝叶斯推断

研究问题
当倾向得分模型与结果模型都可能设定错误时,如何合成多个候选模型,降低平均处理效应估计的偏差并量化不确定性?
方法与思路
作者提出双重稳健贝叶斯回归合成,分别集成倾向得分与结果模型,以个体层面更新的权重适应异质性,并进行后验计算。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称即使没有单个模型正确,所提集成仍可获得一致性;模拟与母亲吸烟对出生体重的应用用于展示其估计表现。
阅读关注点
应核对集成一致性所需的模型覆盖与先验条件、权重识别、处理效应识别假设,以及后验区间的频率学覆盖表现。
阅读边界
这是 arXiv 预印本,同行评审或期刊接收未核实;摘要未说明一致性的具体条件,不能理解为任意双重误设下均无偏。

原文摘要

The doubly robust estimator, which models both the propensity score and outcomes, is a popular approach to estimate the average treatment effect in the potential outcome setting. The primary appeal of this estimator is its theoretical property, wherein the estimator achieves consistency as long as either the propensity score or outcomes is correctly specified. In most applications, however, both are misspecified, leading to considerable bias that cannot be checked. In this paper, we propose a Bayesian ensemble approach that synthesizes multiple models for both the propensity score and outcomes, which we call doubly robust Bayesian regression synthesis. Our approach applies Bayesian updating to the ensemble model weights that adapt at the unit level, incorporating data heterogeneity, to significantly mitigate misspecification bias. Theoretically, we show that our proposed approach is consistent regarding the estimation of both the propensity score and outcomes, ensuring that the doubly robust estimator is consistent, even if no single model is correctly specified. An efficient algorithm for posterior computation facilitates the characterization of uncertainty regarding the treatment effect. Our proposed approach is compared against standard and state-of-the-art methods through two comprehensive simulation studies, where we find that our approach is superior in all cases. An empirical study on the impact of maternal smoking on birth weight highlights the practical applicability of our proposed method.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文