跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要属于群体遗传学的层级建模,没有经济面板、结构估计或其他所列细分领域的直接证据。

反馈分类问题

Assessing Population Differentiation and Isolation from Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Data

利用单核苷酸多态性数据评估群体分化与隔离

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
George Nicholson
Albert V. Smith
Frosti Jónsson
Ómar Gústafsson
Kári Stefánsson
Peter Donnelly

利用单核苷酸多态性数据评估群体分化与隔离

研究问题
如何通过单核苷酸多态性的等位基因频率估计不同群体的分化与隔离程度,并考虑位点筛选的影响?
方法与思路
作者建立群体频率的层级模型,以 MCMC 拟合,设置群体特异的隔离参数,并刻画群体分化后的过渡状态。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,方法在所考察数据规模下改善参数估计且便于检查拟合;两组人类数据分析提示冰岛群体分化更明显。
阅读关注点
应核对隔离参数与 FST 的关系、位点筛选机制、先验与 MCMC 诊断,以及比较方法和模型拟合检验。
阅读边界
依据所给 Crossref 摘要;性能比较和群体结论限于作者考察的设置,摘要未提供数值、不确定性或后续版本变化。

原文摘要

Summary We introduce a new, hierarchical, model for single-nucleotide polymorphism allele frequencies in a structured population, which is naturally fitted via Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. There is one parameter for each population, closely analogous to a population-specific version of Wright's FST, which can be interpreted as measuring how isolated the relevant population has been. Our model includes the effects of single-nucleotide polymorphism ascertainment and is motivated by population genetics considerations, explicitly in the transient setting after divergence of populations, rather than as the equilibrium of a stochastic model, as is traditionally the case. For the sizes of data set that we consider the method provides good parameter estimates and considerably outperforms estimation methods analogous to those currently used in practice. We apply the method to one new and one existing human data set, each with rather different characteristics—the first consisting of three rather close European populations; the second of four populations taken from across the globe. A novelty of our framework is that the fit of the underlying model can be assessed easily, and these results are encouraging for both data sets analysed. Our analysis suggests that Iceland is more differentiated than the other two European populations (France and Utah), a finding which is consistent with the historical record, but not obvious from comparisons of simple summary statistics.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文