跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要主要讨论通用加性模型的贝叶斯估计与函数选择,电力负荷应用未明确预测任务,故不强行归入所列方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Michael Smith

高维加性模型中半参数函数的贝叶斯识别、选择与估计

研究问题
在包含大量未知平滑函数的加性模型中,如何同时保证各函数效应可识别、控制平滑程度,并选择需要保留的函数?
方法与思路
作者用基函数展开和带线性约束的高斯先验正则化函数,加入零点质量实现选择,并以 MCMC 和模型平均开展推断。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,方法可处理可能秩亏的先验精度矩阵,并提供更高效的采样方案;比较实验及日内电力负荷应用展示其表现。
阅读关注点
应核对线性约束如何保证效应识别、收缩先验如何改善采样效率,以及函数选择、误差协方差设定和比较实验的设计。
阅读边界
所给出版社摘要未报告性能差距或具体先验条件;其有利比较结果不能直接推广至任意高维模型或其他负荷数据。

原文摘要

In this paper we propose an approach to both estimate and select unknown smooth functions in an additive model with potentially many functions. Each function is written as a linear combination of basis terms, with coefficients regularized by a proper linearly constrained Gaussian prior. Given any potentially rank deficient prior precision matrix, we show how to derive linear constraints so that the corresponding effect is identified in the additive model. This allows for the use of a wide range of bases and precision matrices in priors for regularization. By introducing indicator variables, each constrained Gaussian prior is augmented with a point mass at zero, thus allowing for function selection. Posterior inference is calculated using Markov chain Monte Carlo and the smoothness in the functions is both the result of shrinkage through the constrained Gaussian prior and model averaging. We show how using non-degenerate priors on the shrinkage parameters enables the application of substantially more computationally efficient sampling schemes than would otherwise be the case. We show the favourable performance of our approach when compared to two contemporary alternative Bayesian methods. To highlight the potential of our approach in high-dimensional settings we apply it to estimate two large seemingly unrelated regression models for intra-day electricity load. Both models feature a variety of different univariate and bivariate functions which require different levels of smoothing, and where component selection is meaningful. Priors for the error disturbance covariances are selected carefully and the empirical results provide a substantive contribution to the electricity load modelling literature in their own right.

笔记与分组