跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要以层级逻辑回归建模二元登记状态概率,直接涉及离散响应回归方法。

反馈分类问题

Hierarchical Logistic Regression Models for Imputation of Unresolved Enumeration Status in Undercount Estimation

漏计估计中未确定登记状态插补的层级逻辑回归模型

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Thomas R. Belin
Gregg J. Diffendal
Steve Mack
Donald B. Rubin
Joseph L. Schafer
Alan M. Zaslavsky

漏计估计中未确定登记状态插补的层级逻辑回归模型

研究问题
在人口普查覆盖评估中,如何插补追访后仍未确定的登记状态,并为已确定案例很少或没有的匹配代码组预测概率?
方法与思路
作者采用含组别效应的混合层级逻辑回归,利用组间信息共享,通过近似 ECM 算法拟合,并以重抽样评估参数不确定性。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,层级模型可为资料稀少的组生成预测,参数不确定性被纳入人口估计总误差评估,并报告一九九〇年应用。
阅读关注点
应核对未确定状态的缺失假设、组间信息共享结构、后验大样本近似的适用性,以及插补误差如何进入总误差。
阅读边界
仅依据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;缺失假设、近似误差和具体应用结果未说明,不能据此确认插补无偏。

原文摘要

In the process of collecting Post-Enumeration Survey (PES) data to evaluate census coverage, it is inevitable that there will be some individuals whose enumeration status (outcome in the census-PES match) remains unresolved even after extensive field follow-up operations. Earlier work developed a logistic regression framework for imputing the probability that unresolved individuals were enumerated in the census, so that the probability of having been enumerated is allowed to depend on covariates. The covariates may include demographic characteristics, geographic information, and census codes that summarize information on the characteristics of the match (e.g., the before-follow-up match code assigned by clerks to describe the type of match between PES and census records). In the production of 1990 undercount estimates, the basic logistic regression model was expanded into a mixed hierarchical model to allow for the presence of group-specific effects, where groups are characterized by common before-follow-up match code. Parameter estimates for individual match-code groups thus “borrow strength” across groups by making use of observed relationships between group-specific parameter estimates in the various groups and the characteristics of the groups. This allows predictions to be made for groups for which there are few or no resolved cases to which to fit the model. The model was fitted by an approximate expectation-conditional-maximization (ECM) algorithm, using a large-sample approximation to the posterior distributions of group parameters. Uncertainty in estimation of model parameters was evaluated using a resampling procedure and became part of the evaluation of total error in PES estimates of population. Results from fitting the model in the 1990 Census and PES are described.

笔记与分组