跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论通用高维回归变量选择及后验可信区域,未提供能对应所列经济或金融细分的具体研究问题。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Howard D. Bondell
Brian J. Reich

基于惩罚可信区域的一致高维贝叶斯变量选择

研究问题
预测变量数量远超样本量时,如何利用贝叶斯后验信息进行稀疏变量选择,并减少模型空间搜索和先验选择带来的负担?
方法与思路
作者仅对完整模型参数设置共轭先验,在联合后验可信区域内寻找稀疏解,并研究利用边际可信区间进行选择的性质。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,联合可信区域方法具有模型选择一致性;边际区间在一定条件下允许维度指数增长,并在相关变量情形中表现较好。
阅读关注点
应核对可信区域与稀疏目标如何连接、选择一致性的设计与信号条件,以及维度增长结论和方法比较的适用范围。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明,不能推断刊本变化;一致性条件、先验敏感性及性能比较数值均未说明。

原文摘要

For high-dimensional data, particularly when the number of predictors greatly exceeds the sample size, selection of relevant predictors for regression is a challenging problem. Methods such as sure screening, forward selection, or penalized regressions are commonly used. Bayesian variable selection methods place prior distributions on the parameters along with a prior over model space, or equivalently, a mixture prior on the parameters having mass at zero. Since exhaustive enumeration is not feasible, posterior model probabilities are often obtained via long MCMC runs. The chosen model can depend heavily on various choices for priors and also posterior thresholds. Alternatively, we propose a conjugate prior only on the full model parameters and use sparse solutions within posterior credible regions to perform selection. These posterior credible regions often have closed-form representations, and it is shown that these sparse solutions can be computed via existing algorithms. The approach is shown to outperform common methods in the high-dimensional setting, particularly under correlation. By searching for a sparse solution within a joint credible region, consistent model selection is established. Furthermore, it is shown that, under certain conditions, the use of marginal credible intervals can give consistent selection up to the case where the dimension grows exponentially in the sample size. The proposed approach successfully accomplishes variable selection in the high-dimensional setting, while avoiding pitfalls that plague typical Bayesian variable selection methods.

笔记与分组