跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要同时涉及动态面板工具变量估计与单位根、近单位根时间序列极限理论。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者

近单位根动态面板中的 Anderson–Hsiao 估计

研究问题
当动态面板的自回归根等于或接近单位根时,Anderson–Hsiao 工具变量估计的相合性、收敛速度和极限分布如何变化?
方法与思路
作者分别分析单位根与多种近单位根参数序列,并比较时间维度固定、序贯增长及两个样本维度联合增长时的极限理论。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,单位根下固定时间维度可导致不一致及柯西型极限,而时间维度增长可恢复相合性;近单位根速率影响正态性和联合收敛。
阅读关注点
应核对初始条件、误差与工具变量设定,局部参数的范围,以及不同近单位根速率下序贯极限与联合极限的区别。
阅读边界
仅依据所给 Crossref 摘要;具体假设和局部参数限制未说明,所述柯西或正态极限须按相应增长情形解读,不能直接套用常规推断。

原文摘要

Limit theory is developed for the dynamic panel IV estimator in the presence of an autoregressive root near unity. In the unit root case, Anderson–Hsiao lagged variable instruments satisfy orthogonality conditions but are well known to be irrelevant. For a fixed time series sample size ( T ) IV is inconsistent and approaches a shifted Cauchy-distributed random variate as the cross-section sample size n → ∞. But when T → ∞, either for fixed n or as n → ∞, IV is $\sqrt T$ consistent and its limit distribution is a ratio of random variables that converges to twice a standard Cauchy as n → ∞. In this case, the usual instruments are uncorrelated with the regressor but irrelevance does not prevent consistent estimation. The same Cauchy limit theory holds sequentially and jointly as ( n , T ) → ∞ with no restriction on the divergence rates of n and T. When the common autoregressive root $\rho = 1 + c/\sqrt T$ the panel comprises a collection of mildly integrated time series. In this case, the IV estimator is $\sqrt n$ consistent for fixed T and $\sqrt {nT}$ consistent with limit distribution N (0, 4) when ( n , T ) → ∞ sequentially or jointly. These results are robust for common roots of the form ρ = 1+ c / T γ for all γ ∈ (0, 1) and joint convergence holds. Limit normality holds but the variance changes when γ = 1. When γ > 1 joint convergence fails and sequential limits differ with different rates of convergence. These findings reveal the fragility of conventional Gaussian IV asymptotics to persistence in dynamic panel regressions.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文