Rerandomization Inference on Regression and Shift Effects: Computationally Feasible Methods
回归与位移效应的再随机化推断:计算可行的方法AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确基于实验随机分配及加性处理剂量效应构造检验和置信区间,直接涉及因果推断。
回归与位移效应的再随机化推断:计算可行的方法AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
An idea due to Quade (1973) is used to develop a method that reduces the computational load for rerandomization inferences in certain situations, and, for experiments carried out with a sufficiently small reference set of randomizations, makes computations entirely feasible. Consider an experimental design for N units for which an experimental plan E is to be chosen randomly from a set of K plans. Plan E will assign treatment dosage dE,u to unit u with postulated additive effect δdE,u reflected in the observation zu . Rerandomization inferences are to be carried out by means of “pivotal” statistics te,E (z) = [bE (z) - be (z)]/[1 - be (d E )], where z and d E are observation and dosage vectors and be ([mdot]) is the regression (slope) onto d e , the dosages under plan e (∈ ). (a) The P value of a test of the hypotheses δ = Δ versus δ > Δ is essentially the proportion of te,E (z) values, e ∈ , that are at most Δ. (b) If t (l),E (z) is the lth largest of the te,E (z)'s, e ∈ , then a (L - l)/K confidence interval is t (l),E (z) ≤ δ ≤ t (L),E (z). (c) The power of the α-level test of δ = Δ is F(δ - Δ), where F is the left-continuous empirical cdf of -t (l),E (ζ), E ∈ —l being the largest integer ≤ αK and ζ the vector of N potential observations without any treatment effects. The computations for (a) and (b) are O(K) and for (c) O(K 2), and K may be as small as 1,000 (or less). This article formulates the rerandomization regression model and develops the pivotal method. The special case of the two-sample shift problem is also treated. The merits of the randomization model, in contrast to a random sampling model, are stressed.