Bayesian Hidden Markov Modeling of Array CGH Data
阵列比较基因组杂交数据的贝叶斯隐马尔可夫建模AI 解读 ↓
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明
本页整理公开书目信息，不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成，未完成全文核验，可能有误；具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本，未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要；缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录，不合计多个记录；关联记录可能包含正式发表版本，不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零，引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配，同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列，再参考通用方法与发表日期。
分类依据与纠错
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类：隐马尔可夫模型用于基因组序列分析，摘要没有宏观时间序列或其他所列领域的直接证据。
反馈分类问题
正在核对关联版本…
代码、数据与补充材料
正在核对对应版本的资源…
关注这篇论文的作者
阵列比较基因组杂交数据的贝叶斯隐马尔可夫建模
- 研究问题
- 面对组织样本污染、归一化误差及荧光强度比的依赖性，如何从阵列CGH数据识别DNA拷贝数的增加与减少？
- 方法与思路
- 作者以贝叶斯隐马尔可夫模型处理强度比的依赖，通过Metropolis-within-Gibbs抽样获得拷贝数变化的后验推断。
- 材料陈述的贡献
- 摘要称，该方法能识别局部扩增、缺失和较长区域的拷贝数变化，并用三类癌症的公开数据与常用算法进行比较。
- 阅读关注点
- 应核对隐状态与拷贝数的对应、观测误差设定、后验判定规则，以及算法比较是否使用一致的识别标准。
- 阅读边界
- 仅据OpenAlex索引摘要，稿件版本未注明；摘要未提供误差模型细节、识别阈值或比较数值，不能确认普遍优越性。
原文摘要
Genomic alterations have been linked to the development and progression of cancer. The technique of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) yields data consisting of fluorescence intensity ratios of test and reference DNA samples. The intensity ratios provide information about the number of copies in DNA. Practical issues such as the contamination of tumor cells in tissue specimens and normalization errors necessitate the use of statistics for learning about the genomic alterations from array CGH data. As increasing amounts of array CGH data become available, there is a growing need for automated algorithms for characterizing genomic profiles. Specifically, there is a need for algorithms that can identify gains and losses in the number of copies based on statistical considerations, rather than merely detect trends in the data.We adopt a Bayesian approach, relying on the hidden Markov model to account for the inherent dependence in the intensity ratios. Posterior inferences are made about gains and losses in copy number. Localized amplifications (associated with oncogene mutations) and deletions (associated with mutations of tumor suppressors) are identified using posterior probabilities. Global trends such as extended regions of altered copy number are detected. Because the posterior distribution is analytically intractable, we implement a Metropolis-within-Gibbs algorithm for efficient simulation-based inference. Publicly available data on pancreatic adenocarcinoma, glioblastoma multiforme, and breast cancer are analyzed, and comparisons are made with some widely used algorithms to illustrate the reliability and success of the technique.