跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究调查选择和无响应校正,未明确涉及所列因果效应、面板或分位数与分布效应方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Michael Peress

利用变化的响应倾向校正调查无响应

研究问题
当基于已知人口特征的后分层加权仍无法消除调查无响应偏差时,能否利用受访者响应倾向信息推断未响应人群?
方法与思路
作者用拨打电话次数、暂时拒访和访问员记录的合作程度代理响应倾向,再从低响应倾向受访者向未响应者进行外推。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要提出校正不可忽略无响应的新估计方法;选举调查应用称政治参与相关题项偏差较严重,所提方法可明显降低无响应偏差。
阅读关注点
应核对响应倾向代理的有效性、从低倾向受访者外推的模型限制,以及偏差减少如何验证、对外推设定是否敏感。
阅读边界
仅据所给 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;外推所需条件及验证基准未提供,不能认定该方法普遍消除不可忽略无响应。

原文摘要

All surveys with less than full response potentially suffer from nonresponse bias. Poststratification weights can only correct for selection into the sample based on observables whose distribution is known in the population. Variables such as gender, race, income, and region satisfy this requirement because they are available from the U.S. Census Bureau, but poststratification based on these variables may not eliminate nonresponse bias. I develop an approach for correcting for nonignorable nonresponse bias. Survey respondents can be classified by their “response propensity.” Proxies for response propensity include the number of attempted phone calls, indicators of temporary refusal, and interviewer-coded measures of cooperativeness. We can then learn about the population of nonrespondents by extrapolating from the low-propensity respondents. I apply this new estimator to correct for unit nonresponse bias in the American National Election Study and in a CBS / New York Times preelection poll. I find that nonresponse bias can be a serious problem, particularly for items that relate to political participation. I find that my method is successful in substantially reducing nonresponse bias.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文