The Tracy–Widom law for the largest eigenvalue of F type matrices
F 型矩阵最大特征值的 Tracy–Widom 分布律AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要提供随机矩阵谱极限理论,未明确涉及因子模型或其他所列计量应用。
F 型矩阵最大特征值的 Tracy–Widom 分布律AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Let ${\mathbf{A}}_{p}=\frac{{\mathbf{Y}}{\mathbf{Y}}^{*}}{m}$ and ${\mathbf{B}}_{p}=\frac{{\mathbf{X}}{\mathbf{X}}^{*}}{n}$ be two independent random matrices where ${\mathbf{X}}=(X_{ij})_{p\times n}$ and ${\mathbf{Y}}=(Y_{ij})_{p\times m}$ respectively consist of real (or complex) independent random variables with $\mathbb{E}X_{ij}=\mathbb{E}Y_{ij}=0$, $\mathbb{E}|X_{ij}|^{2}=\mathbb{E}|Y_{ij}|^{2}=1$. Denote by $\lambda_{1}$ the largest root of the determinantal equation $\det(\lambda{\mathbf{A}}_{p}-{\mathbf{B}}_{p})=0$. We establish the Tracy–Widom type universality for $\lambda_{1}$ under some moment conditions on $X_{ij}$ and $Y_{ij}$ when $p/m$ and $p/n$ approach positive constants as $p\rightarrow\infty$.
多因子线性资产定价模型 GMM 估计中的效率与定价精度权衡
Even though a multi-factor linear asset pricing model can be equivalently represented in a Beta or in a stochastic discount factor (SDF) form, its inferential efficiency and pricing accuracy features may differ when estimated by the generalized method of moments (GMM), both in small and in large samples. We derive the analytical asymptotic variance of the Beta and the SDF estimators under GMM and find that the SDF approach is likely to be less efficient but to yield more…
This article introduces a framework for evaluating statistical decisions under both prior ambiguity and likelihood misspecification. We begin with an ambiguity set - a frequentist model that pairs a possibly misspecified likelihood with every possible prior - and uniformly expand it by a Kullback-Leibler radius to accommodate likelihood misspecification. We show that optimal decisions under this framework are equivalent to minimax decisions with an exponentially tilted loss…
Two frequent approaches for identifying structural VARs are external instruments, which carry economic content but are often weak, and non-Gaussianity of the shocks, which provides statistical identification but carries no economic meaning. We combine the two strategies in a single generalized method of moments framework. This hybrid approach point-identifies the target shocks while also identifying the non-target shocks up to sign and ordering. Under suitable rank…
内生性检验:一种基于矩的贝叶斯方法
A standard assumption in the Bayesian estimation of linear regression models is that the regressors are exogenous in the sense that they are uncorrelated with the model error term. In practice, however, this assumption can be invalid. In this article, using the exponentially tilted empirical likelihood (ETEL) framework, we develop a Bayes factor test for endogeneity that compares a base model that is correctly specified under exogeneity but misspecified under endogeneity…
动态面板多项Logit模型
This paper provides moment conditions for dynamic multinomial logit panel data models with individual specific fixed effects. The moment conditions do not depend on the fixed effects and thus form the basis for generalized method of moments estimation. For a leading case, we provide sufficient conditions under which the moment conditions identify the common parameters, and we illustrate their use in an empirical application to household soft drink purchases. The construction…
基于小球方法的物理信息统计学习复杂度相关误差率
Physics-informed statistical learning (PISL) integrates empirical data with physical knowledge to enhance the statistical performance of estimators. While PISL methods are widely used in practice, a comprehensive theoretical understanding of how informed regularization affects statistical properties is still missing. Specifically, two fundamental questions have yet to be fully addressed: (A) what is the trade-off between soft penalties and hard constraints, and (B) what is…