跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用线性回归参数化与组别异质性,未提供因果识别或其他所列细分领域的充分依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Daniel R. Kowal

通过统计高效的类别调节变量促进异质效应估计

研究问题
在线性回归中加入类别交互项时,如何保留主效应的解释与估计稳定性,同时识别组别之间的异质关联?
方法与思路
作者使用基于类别丰度的约束进行重新参数化和估计,处理类别与连续变量及类别之间的交互关系。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称在适当条件下,加入交互项不会改变主效应估计,并能增强其统计功效;模拟与教育应用用于展示。
阅读关注点
应核对丰度约束的定义、主效应不变与功效提高所需条件,以及所谓公平性具体对应哪些参数解释。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;适用条件未展开,回归中的异质效应不能仅凭摘要解释为因果效应。

原文摘要

Categorical covariates such as race, sex, or group are ubiquitous in regression analysis. While main-only (or ANCOVA) linear models are predominant, linear models that include categorical-continuous or categorical-categorical interactions are increasingly important and allow heterogeneous, group-specific effects. However, with standard approaches, the addition of categorical interactions fundamentally alters the estimates and interpretations of the main effects, often inflates their standard errors, and introduces significant concerns about group (e.g., racial) biases. We advocate an alternative parametrization and estimation scheme using abundance-based constraints (ABCs). ABCs induce a model parametrization that is both interpretable and equitable. Crucially, we show that with ABCs, the addition of categorical interactions 1) leaves main effect estimates unchanged and 2) enhances their statistical power, under reasonable conditions. Thus, analysts can, and arguably should include categorical interactions in linear models to discover potential heterogeneous effects—without compromising estimation, inference, and interpretability for the main effects. Using simulated data, we verify these invariance properties for estimation and inference and showcase the capabilities of ABCs to increase statistical power. We apply these tools to study demographic heterogeneities among the effects of social and environmental factors on STEM educational outcomes for children in North Carolina. An R package lmabc is available.

笔记与分组