Exact, Nonparametric Inference When Doses Are Measured With Random Errors
剂量含随机测量误差时的精确非参数推断AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要围绕暴露效应、不同剂量和匹配零剂量对照开展推断,与因果推断设计相关。
剂量含随机测量误差时的精确非参数推断AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Studies that estimate the effects of exposure to a possibly harmful agent often compare exposed subjects who received varied doses with matched controls who received zero dose. If the doses are measured with error, then one may wish to use the fallible doses to estimate a linear relationship between the unobserved true dose and the observed response. If one is willing to assume that the dose errors for exposed subjects are symmetrically distributed about 0—that is, the dose errors are pure errors and not, say, systematic underreporting of exposure—then the presence of zero-dose controls is all that is needed to obtain exact, distribution-free confidence intervals and tests, and consistent point estimates. The method is simpler for matched pairs than for matched sets with two or more matched subjects, and it is illustrated using two studies, one of each kind. With matched pairs, as in this first example, the method uses Wilcoxon's signed rank test as the basis for inference. When there are several zero-dose controls matched to each exposed subject, the familiar null distribution of the signed rank statistic is no longer applicable because of dependence within matched sets, so the appropriate exact distribution and large-sample approximation are developed.