跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确涉及因果中介、反事实干预、路径特定效应识别和处理诱发混杂。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Iván Díaz

中间混杂下因果中介分析的信息传递干预

研究问题
面对不可操控的原因以及处理诱发的中介—结果混杂,如何定义可识别的路径特定效应,并据此检验因果作用机制?
方法与思路
作者以改变图中边上传递的信息来定义干预,构建路径分解;针对协方差版本,结合数据自适应回归与半参数效率理论估计。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,这类效应在处理诱发中介—结果混杂下可识别,并能提供有效机制检验;作者还提出高效非参数估计并给出两个数据示例。
阅读关注点
应核对信息传递干预的反事实含义、路径效应识别条件、机制检验有效性的定义,以及协方差版本与一般效应之间的关系。
阅读边界
仅据Crossref摘要,未提供具体识别条件;其中“n-consistency”的速率记号可能不完整,需查阅原PDF,不能自行补出收敛速率。

原文摘要

Abstract Recent approaches to causal inference have focused on causal effects defined as contrasts between the distribution of counterfactual outcomes under hypothetical interventions on the nodes of a graphical model. In this article, we develop theory for causal effects defined with respect to a different type of intervention, one which alters the information propagated through the edges of the graph. These information transfer interventions may be more useful than node interventions in settings in which causes are non-manipulable, for example when considering race or genetics as a causes. Furthermore, information transfer interventions allow us to define path-specific decompositions which are identified in the presence of treatment-induced mediator-outcome confounding, a practical problem whose general solution remains elusive. We prove that the proposed effects provide valid statistical tests of mechanisms, unlike popular methods based on randomised interventions on the mediator. We propose efficient non-parametric estimators for a covariance version of the proposed effects, using data-adaptive regression coupled with semi-parametric efficiency theory to address model misspecification bias while retaining n-consistency and asymptotic normality. We illustrate the use of our methods in two examples using publicly available data.

笔记与分组