跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究随机实验中的平均处理效应、协变量调整和基于实验设计的因果推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Anqi Zhao
Peng Ding

多处理臂及可能包含析因结构的实验中的协变量调整

研究问题
在多处理臂及析因随机实验中,如何用回归调整提高平均处理效应估计效率,并权衡完全交互模型的有限样本波动与约束误设?
方法与思路
作者从实验设计视角比较加性与完全交互OLS调整,再研究受限最小二乘,区分处理指标系数约束与处理—协变量交互约束。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,正确约束下可获渐近效率;处理系数约束正确且与交互约束分离时保持一致性,适度误设时也可能改善有限样本表现。
阅读关注点
应核对不同约束的准确形式、相互分离条件、效率比较基准与标准误构造,并理解无需线性模型假设的设计型推断范围。
阅读边界
仅据Crossref摘要;一致性仍有明确的约束条件,有限样本改善也只是可能,不能理解为任意约束、任意误设下都有效或更高效。

原文摘要

Abstract Randomized experiments are the gold standard for causal inference and enable unbiased estimation of treatment effects. Regression adjustment provides a convenient way to incorporate covariate information for additional efficiency. This article provides a unified account of its utility for improving estimation efficiency in multiarmed experiments. We start with the commonly used additive and fully interacted models for regression adjustment in estimating average treatment effects (ATE), and clarify the trade-offs between the resulting ordinary least squares (OLS) estimators in terms of finite sample performance and asymptotic efficiency. We then move on to regression adjustment based on restricted least squares (RLS), and establish for the first time its properties for inferring ATE from the design-based perspective. The resulting inference has multiple guarantees. First, it is asymptotically efficient when the restriction is correctly specified. Second, it remains consistent as long as the restriction on the coefficients of the treatment indicators, if any, is correctly specified and separate from that on the coefficients of the treatment-covariate interactions. Third, it can have better finite sample performance than the unrestricted counterpart even when the restriction is moderately misspecified. It is thus our recommendation when the OLS fit of the fully interacted regression risks large finite sample variability in case of many covariates, many treatments, yet a moderate sample size. In addition, the newly established theory of RLS also provides a unified way of studying OLS-based inference from general regression specifications. As an illustration, we demonstrate its value for studying OLS-based regression adjustment in factorial experiments. Importantly, although we analyse inferential procedures that are motivated by OLS, we do not invoke any assumptions required by the underlying linear models.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文