跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究响应依赖抽样与通用估计函数,逻辑模型仅为特例,未提供经济离散选择或因果识别方向的充分依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
V. P. Godambe
K. Vijayan

响应依赖回顾性抽样的最优估计

研究问题
当总体中所有个体的响应已知,而协变量按依赖响应的设计抽样观察时,如何有效推断响应与协变量的关系并处理干扰参数?
方法与思路
作者利用估计函数理论构造目标参数的最优估计,同时考察固定响应的条件分析与无条件分析,并讨论分层对干扰参数的作用。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称建立了条件和无条件最优性,在逻辑模型中证明一种前瞻与回顾得分相等的结果,模拟表现优于常用估计方法。
阅读关注点
应核对最优性所比较的估计函数类、响应依赖设计的限制、分层消除干扰参数的机制,以及得分相等结论的具体版本。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明,不能推断刊本变化;最优性的完整条件与模拟幅度未说明,不能推广至任意抽样设计。

原文摘要

In more conventional analytic surveys, we sample the response variates y through a sampling design that is dependent on the covariate x. The x values are assumed known for all the units in the population. However, contrary to these situations, there are areas of statistical application when the values of the response variable are known for all the individuals but not the values of covariate (for example, in epidemiology and reliability). Here we sample the x values the sampling design used depends on the response variate y. The problem that we study is the same as usual—namely, inference regarding dependence of the response y on the covariate x. Some work in this direction has already been done. In this article we use estimating function theory to establish optimum estimation for the parameter of interest. This optimality holds conditionally when the response variable is fixed as well as unconditionally. We demonstrate that here for response-dependent sampling stratification plays the same role as in conventional surveys; that is, balancing on or eliminating nuisance parameters. As a special case, for the logistic model we establish a version of the conjecture that “the prospective score is equal to the retrospective score.” In simulation studies, the above-mentioned optimal estimation performs much better than the estimation in more common use.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文