Minimax Risk Over Hyperrectangles, and Implications
超矩形上的极小极大风险及其含义AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究高斯估计的风险与几何理论,未涉及所列微观、宏观或金融具体方向。
超矩形上的极小极大风险及其含义AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Consider estimating the mean of a standard Gaussian shift when that mean is known to lie in an orthosymmetric quadratically convex set in $l_2$. Such sets include ellipsoids, hyperrectangles and $l_p$-bodies with $p > 2$. The minimax risk among linear estimates is within 25% of the minimax risk among all estimates. The minimax risk among truncated series estimates is within a factor 4.44 of the minimax risk. This implies that the difficulty of estimation--a statistical quantity--is measured fairly precisely by the $n$-widths--a geometric quantity. If the set is not quadratically convex, as in the case of $l_p$-bodies with $p < 2$, things change appreciably. Minimax linear estimators may be out-performed arbitrarily by nonlinear estimates. The (ordinary, Kolmogorov) $n$-widths still determine the difficulty of linear estimation, but the difficulty of nonlinear estimation is tied to the (inner, Bernstein) $n$-widths, which can be far smaller. Essential use is made of a new heuristic: that the difficulty of the hardest rectangular subproblem is equal to the difficulty of the full problem.