Sample Size Allocation for Simultaneous Inference in Comparison with Control Experiments
与对照组比较实验中同时推断的样本量分配AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用实验设计与同时推断,未明确涉及所列计量细分领域。
与对照组比较实验中同时推断的样本量分配AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
A common experiment is to compare p ≥ 2 test treatments with a control in a one-way layout. The object of the experiment can be to establish which test treatments are statistically significantly different from or better than the control or to give simultaneous confidence bounds on the amount of improvement that each of the test treatments offers over the control. Frequently, further experimentation is done with the promising treatments. We consider the problem of optimal allocation of a small to moderate number of observations to treatments in this setting under the assumption of normality with equal variances. The criterion of minimizing the average expected allowance of the simultaneous 95% confidence bounds for the p contrasts between the individual test treatment means and the control mean is used. Dunnett (1955) gave an asymptotic result for the optimal allocation under the assumption of equal test treatment sample sizes. We give tables of optimal designs under the restriction of equal test treatment sample sizes and under the restriction that the test treatment sample sizes differ by at most 1. Considerable tightening of the average allowance can be achieved in some cases by allowing the test treatment sample sizes to differ by 1.