阅读说明
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
分类依据与纠错
分类依据题名和摘要中的方法词与领域语境,不使用期刊名称猜测研究方向。
正在核对关联版本…
代码、数据与补充材料
正在核对对应版本的资源…
关注这篇论文的作者
原文摘要
This paper reports on a study of the timing of the economic impact of government defense procurement. By assuming that the letting of new orders signals the beginning and shipments signal the end of the impact of defense procurement, this research investigates the effects of changes in product mix and capacity utilization on the duration of such impacts. The effects of changes in product mix and capacity utilization on inventory accumulation are also investigated. RECENT DISCUSSIONS on econometric model building have pointed out that the development of a realistic model of the government sector is a prerequisite to the effective use of econometric models in evaluating the impact of government operations on the economy [7]. There are two aspects to this problem: (i) An econometric model should include appropriate instrumental variables-variables that can be controlled by policy makers [11], and (ii) the model should properly capture the impact of the government actions [2, 3,5,13]. This paper presents an explanatory study related to the second aspect of the above problem. Since defense procurement accounts for nearly ten per cent of GNP, a question which naturally arises is: Can defense procurement be manipulated by the government to help stabilize economic activity or to offset cyclical fluctuations? It is to be expected that the timing of defense procurement is determined primarily by noneconomic considerations. In peace time, however, a certain degree of flexibility is presumed to exist in the scheduling of defense procurement. For this reason, defense procurement is a useful instrumental variable for an econometric model of the government sector. In considering defense procurement as an instrumental variable, the following question is raised: What stage in the defense procurement process is most important from the viewpoint of measuring its impact on economic activity? In their studies of inventory investment, Lovell and Suits [10, 12] emphasized that the Department of Defense orders have an immediate impact upon inventories in advance of its expenditures. In a substantial number of other econometric models, however, the impact of defense procurement was measured at the expenditure stage [4,6,8,9].