Negative association, ordering and convergence of resampling methods
重抽样方法的负相依性、排序与收敛AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论一般重抽样和粒子算法,未指定时间序列、宏观预测或金融模型应用,故不足以归入这些细分方向。
重抽样方法的负相依性、排序与收敛AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We study convergence and convergence rates for resampling schemes. Our first main result is a general consistency theorem based on the notion of negative association, which is applied to establish the almost sure weak convergence of measures output from Kitagawa’s [J. Comput. Graph. Statist. 5 (1996) 1–25] stratified resampling method. Carpenter, Ckiffird and Fearnhead’s [IEE Proc. Radar Sonar Navig. 146 (1999) 2–7] systematic resampling method is similar in structure but can fail to converge depending on the order of the input samples. We introduce a new resampling algorithm based on a stochastic rounding technique of [In 42nd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Las Vegas, NV, 2001) (2001) 588–597 IEEE Computer Soc.], which shares some attractive properties of systematic resampling, but which exhibits negative association and, therefore, converges irrespective of the order of the input samples. We confirm a conjecture made by [J. Comput. Graph. Statist. 5 (1996) 1–25] that ordering input samples by their states in $\mathbb{R}$ yields a faster rate of convergence; we establish that when particles are ordered using the Hilbert curve in $\mathbb{R}^{d}$, the variance of the resampling error is ${\scriptstyle\mathcal{O}}(N^{-(1+1/d)})$ under mild conditions, where $N$ is the number of particles. We use these results to establish asymptotic properties of particle algorithms based on resampling schemes that differ from multinomial resampling.