跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦生存分析与纵向协变量,未明确提出面板计量模型或因果效应识别,故不据重复测量自动归类。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Yu-Ru Su
Jane-Ling Wang

带纵向协变量的左截断与右删失生存数据建模

研究问题
当生存数据同时存在左截断、右删失和纵向协变量时,如何处理抽样偏差,并可靠估计生存模型中的回归系数?
方法与思路
作者针对联合似然在左截断情形下的额外困难提出替代似然,讨论生存与纵向部分的偏差,并以模拟和AIDS队列数据示例。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称替代方法可使生存部分回归系数得到无偏且有效的估计,同时专门讨论纵向部分的偏差问题,并提供数值说明。
阅读关注点
应核对截断、删失及纵向测量过程的假设,替代似然如何处理抽样选择,以及无偏性和效率结论具体针对哪些参数。
阅读边界
仅据稿件版本未注明的OpenAlex摘要;关键假设和效率比较基准未说明,生存部分结论不能直接扩展到纵向部分。

原文摘要

There is a surge in medical follow-up studies that include longitudinal covariates in the modeling of survival data. So far, the focus has been largely on right censored survival data. We consider survival data that are subject to both left truncation and right censoring. Left truncation is well known to produce biased sample. The sampling bias issue has been resolved in the literature for the case which involves baseline or time-varying covariates that are observable. The problem remains open however for the important case where longitudinal covariates are present in survival models. A joint likelihood approach has been shown in the literature to provide an effective way to overcome those difficulties for right censored data, but this approach faces substantial additional challenges in the presence of left truncation. Here we thus propose an alternative likelihood to overcome these difficulties and show that the regression coefficient in the survival component can be estimated unbiasedly and efficiently. Issues about the bias for the longitudinal component are discussed. The new approach is illustrated numerically through simulations and data from a multi-center AIDS cohort study.

笔记与分组