Structural similarity and difference testing on multiple sparse Gaussian graphical models
多个稀疏高斯图模型的结构相似性与差异检验AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要的边表示变量间条件依赖,未涉及经济网络或干扰效应,故不据图模型名称归入网络方向。
多个稀疏高斯图模型的结构相似性与差异检验AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We present a new framework on inferring structural similarities and differences among multiple high-dimensional Gaussian graphical models (GGMs) corresponding to the same set of variables under distinct experimental conditions. The new framework adopts the partial correlation coefficients to characterize the potential changes of dependency strengths between two variables. A hierarchical method has been further developed to recover edges with different or similar dependency strengths across multiple GGMs. In particular, we first construct two-sample test statistics for testing the equality of partial correlation coefficients and conduct large-scale multiple tests to estimate the substructure of differential dependencies. After removing differential substructure from original GGMs, a follow-up multiple testing procedure is used to detect the substructure of similar dependencies among GGMs. In each step, false discovery rate is controlled asymptotically at a desired level. Power results are proved, which demonstrate that our method is more powerful on finding common edges than the common approach that separately estimates GGMs. The performance of the proposed hierarchical method is illustrated on simulated datasets.