Induced Factor Augmenting Technical Progress from a Microeconomic Viewpoint
微观视角下的诱致要素增进型技术进步AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论企业技术选择与最优控制,未涉及结构参数估计,也未提供其他所列细分方向的直接证据。
微观视角下的诱致要素增进型技术进步AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
In this paper the question of induced factor augmenting technical change in the context of the profit maximizing firm is addressed. The Kennedy innovation possibility frontier is employed to describe the opportunities available to the firm for factor augmentation and from it the direction of factor augmentation can be chosen. In addition, this opportunity curve can be shifted inwards or outwards according to the expenditure on research and development. The selection of the direction and extent of technical change is first determined via a myopic decision rule and then by maximization of the present value of the stream of net revenue from production and sale of output less the cost of technical advance. In the latter problem the maximum principle of Pontryagin is employed. Questions regarding the existence of stationary states and stability are resolved, and the optimal solutions are compared with the myopic decision rules. IN THIS PAPER further results relating Hicks' theory of induced technical change to the traditional theory of the profit maximizing firm are presented. The mechanism for technical change is disembodied factor augmentation instead of, as presumed in our earlier work, alteration of the parameters of the production function. It turns out, however, that many of the conclusions regarding the effects of technical progress are invariant to the way in which that progress is represented. The assumption of factor augmentation pursued here also yields results not obtained under the alternative model of parametric change studied earlier. Moreover, by using factor augmentation as the vehicle for representing technical change, our results are closely related to and can be compared with those of others working in the area of induced innovation, although those models are macroeconomic in focus [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. In our analysis we envisage a single firm to whom the state of technology is an endogenous variable, alterable at a positive cost; the firm strives to maximize a discounted profits stream over the indefinite but certain future. This problem differs from the one faced by the firm in the more traditional analysis insofar as the firm selects not only the optimal levels of the factors of production, and thereby the level of production, but the optimal technology as well. The desired optimal policies are derived from the appropriate maximization problem. These policies are then compared with those the firm would pursue if it were following a myopic policy of maximizing the instantaneous rate of profit growth under the same opportunities. In addition to discussion of the optimal rate and direction of technical change, the effects of technical change on the firm are also investigated. In particular, the impact upon the rate of production, cost of production, and factor shares are described.