跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论企业技术选择与最优控制,未涉及结构参数估计,也未提供其他所列细分方向的直接证据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
M. I. Kamien
N. L. Schwartz

微观视角下的诱致要素增进型技术进步

研究问题
利润最大化企业如何在有成本的技术改进中选择要素增进的方向与程度?摘要比较短视决策与长期贴现净收益最大化的技术路径。
方法与思路
作者以 Kennedy 创新可能性边界描述要素增进机会,允许研发支出移动该边界,并运用 Pontryagin 最大值原理分析长期技术选择。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,文章分析了稳态存在性与稳定性,比较最优路径和短视规则,并讨论技术进步对产出、生产成本及要素份额的影响。
阅读关注点
应核对研发如何改变创新边界、状态与控制变量如何定义,以及稳态和稳定性的条件;还需辨明短视规则与最优政策的差异。
阅读边界
摘要未说明函数形式、参数条件或经验验证;稳态与政策比较属于模型内分析,不能据此判定真实企业的创新行为或因果效应。

原文摘要

In this paper the question of induced factor augmenting technical change in the context of the profit maximizing firm is addressed. The Kennedy innovation possibility frontier is employed to describe the opportunities available to the firm for factor augmentation and from it the direction of factor augmentation can be chosen. In addition, this opportunity curve can be shifted inwards or outwards according to the expenditure on research and development. The selection of the direction and extent of technical change is first determined via a myopic decision rule and then by maximization of the present value of the stream of net revenue from production and sale of output less the cost of technical advance. In the latter problem the maximum principle of Pontryagin is employed. Questions regarding the existence of stationary states and stability are resolved, and the optimal solutions are compared with the myopic decision rules. IN THIS PAPER further results relating Hicks' theory of induced technical change to the traditional theory of the profit maximizing firm are presented. The mechanism for technical change is disembodied factor augmentation instead of, as presumed in our earlier work, alteration of the parameters of the production function. It turns out, however, that many of the conclusions regarding the effects of technical progress are invariant to the way in which that progress is represented. The assumption of factor augmentation pursued here also yields results not obtained under the alternative model of parametric change studied earlier. Moreover, by using factor augmentation as the vehicle for representing technical change, our results are closely related to and can be compared with those of others working in the area of induced innovation, although those models are macroeconomic in focus [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. In our analysis we envisage a single firm to whom the state of technology is an endogenous variable, alterable at a positive cost; the firm strives to maximize a discounted profits stream over the indefinite but certain future. This problem differs from the one faced by the firm in the more traditional analysis insofar as the firm selects not only the optimal levels of the factors of production, and thereby the level of production, but the optimal technology as well. The desired optimal policies are derived from the appropriate maximization problem. These policies are then compared with those the firm would pursue if it were following a myopic policy of maximizing the instantaneous rate of profit growth under the same opportunities. In addition to discussion of the optimal rate and direction of technical change, the effects of technical change on the firm are also investigated. In particular, the impact upon the rate of production, cost of production, and factor shares are described.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文