跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要以潜在混杂、干预分布和观测数据结合下的因果效应估计为核心,因此归入因果推断,未提供其他细分方向的直接依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Maximilian Ilse
Patrick Forré
Max Welling
Joris M. Mooij

利用因果约简结合干预数据与观测数据

研究问题
存在多个高维潜在混杂变量时,如何简化因果模型并结合干预与观测样本,以改善因果效应估计而不要求所有混杂均被观测?
方法与思路
作者将潜在混杂约简为与处理变量取值空间相同的单一变量,保持观测和干预分布,并分别研究离散、线性高斯与一般连续情形。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,约简可导出分布界或参数等式约束,并支持正规化流建模;部分合成实验中,加入观测数据可减少所需干预样本。
阅读关注点
应核对约简保持分布的具体条件、各情形中的识别与约束强度,以及样本节省结论依赖的数据配置和模型拟合方式。
阅读边界
这是 arXiv 预印本,不能据此认定已通过同行评审或获期刊接收;摘要仅报告部分合成实验,未说明普遍可识别或必然提高精度。

原文摘要

Unobserved confounding is one of the main challenges when estimating causal effects. We propose a causal reduction method that, given a causal model, replaces an arbitrary number of possibly high-dimensional latent confounders with a single latent confounder that takes values in the same space as the treatment variable, without changing the observational and interventional distributions the causal model entails. This allows us to estimate the causal effect in a principled way from combined data without relying on the common but often unrealistic assumption that all confounders have been observed. We apply our causal reduction in three different settings. In the first setting, we assume the treatment and outcome to be discrete. The causal reduction then implies bounds between the observational and interventional distributions that can be exploited for estimation purposes. In certain cases with highly unbalanced observational samples, the accuracy of the causal effect estimate can be improved by incorporating observational data. Second, for continuous variables and assuming a linear-Gaussian model, we derive equality constraints for the parameters of the observational and interventional distributions. Third, for the general continuous setting (possibly nonlinear and non-Gaussian), we parameterize the reduced causal model using normalizing flows, a flexible class of easily invertible nonlinear transformations. We perform a series of experiments on synthetic data and find that in several cases the number of interventional samples can be reduced when adding observational training samples without sacrificing accuracy.

笔记与分组