跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究线性与非线性面板模型中的未知群组结构、组间系数异质性和群组数量选择。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Ruiqi Liu
Zuofeng Shang
Yonghui Zhang
Qiankun Zhou

群组数过度设定的面板模型识别与估计

研究问题
面板模型中群组归属未知、组间系数不同而组内相同时,估计群组数多于真实数量会怎样影响分类与参数估计?
方法与思路
作者将 M 估计用于线性和非线性分组面板模型,研究过度分组下的一致性,并提出选择群组数量的信息准则。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,在相应条件下过度分组仍可一致估计,渐近上可拆分真实群组但不混组;真实组数下分类正确,选组准则亦一致。
阅读关注点
应核对群组分离程度、样本维度增长和组数限制,区分统一一致性与分类一致性,并检查信息准则及优化实现。
阅读边界
仅据所给出版社摘要,不能认为任意过度分组都无代价;具体假设、算法复杂度、模拟数值及两个应用的数据内容未说明。

原文摘要

We propose a simple and fast approach to identify and estimate the unknown group structure in panel models by adapting the M-estimation method. We consider both linear and nonlinear panel models where the regression coefficients are heterogeneous across groups but homogeneous within a group and the group membership is unknown to researchers. The main result of the paper is that under certain assumptions, our approach is able to provide uniformly consistent estimation as long as the number of groups used in estimation is not smaller than the true number of groups. We also show that, asymptotically, our method may partition some true groups into further subgroups, but cannot mix units from different groups. When the true number of groups is used in estimation, all units can be categorized correctly with probability approaching one, and we establish the limiting distribution for the estimators of the group parameters. In addition, we provide an information criterion to select the number of groups, and establish the consistency of the selection criterion under some mild conditions. Monte Carlo simulations are conducted to examine the finite sample performance of the proposed method. The findings in the simulation confirm our theoretical results in the paper. Applications to two real datasets also highlight the necessity to consider both individual heterogeneity and group heterogeneity in the model.

笔记与分组