跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究生存风险率的拟合优度检验,此处风险率不构成金融尾部风险分类依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Edsel A. Peña

风险率模型复合假设的平滑拟合优度检验

研究问题
风险率属于带未知参数的模型族时,如何扩展 Neyman 平滑拟合优度检验,并分析参数估计对局部检验功效的影响?
方法与思路
作者将原假设风险率族嵌入指数扰动的扩展模型,以拟合参数下的过程统计量构造二次型检验,并分析局部备择下的性质。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称给出检验的渐近性质与局部功效,讨论参数估计影响,并为常数和 Weibull 风险率构造检验,提供模拟及数据应用。
阅读关注点
应核对计数过程和补偿过程的定义、扰动过程的选择条件,以及删失机制和参数估计如何影响零假设分布及局部功效。
阅读边界
材料为版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要,其中公式括号及补偿过程表述存在不清楚之处,需查原 PDF,不能重构公式或验证检验性质。

原文摘要

Consider a counting process $N(t), t\inT}$ with compensator process ${A(t),t\in T}$, where $A(t)=\int_0^t Y(s) ds, {Y(t), t\in T}$ is an observable predictable process, and $\lambda_0(\dot)$ is an unknown hazard rate function. A general procedure for extending Neyman’s smooth goodness­of­fit test for the composite null hypothesis $H_0: \lambda_0(\dot)\inC ={\lambda_0(\dot;\eta):\eta\in\Gamma\subseteq\Re^q}$ is proposed and developed. The extension is obtained by embedding $C$ in the class $A_ k$ whose members are of the form $\lambda_0(\dot;\eta)\exp{\theta^t\psi(\dot;\eta)}, (\eta,\theta) \in\Gamma\times\Re^k$, where $\psi(\dot;\eta)=(\psi_1(\dot;\eta,\ldots,\psi_k(\dot;\eta))^t$ is a vector of observable random processes satisfying certain regularity conditions. The tests are based on quadratic forms of the statistic $\int_0^\tau\psi(s;\hat{\eta})dM(s;\hat{\eta})$, where $M(t;\eta) = N(t) - \int_0^t Y(s)\lambda_0(s;\eta) ds$ and $\hat {\eta}$ is a restricted maximum likelihood estimator of $\eta$. Asymptotic properties of the test statistics are obtained under a sequence of local alternatives, and the asymptotic local powers of the tests are examined. The effect of estimating $\eta$ by $\hat{\eta}$ is ascertained, and the problem of choosing the $\lambda$­process is discussed. The procedure is illustrated by developing tests for testing that $\lambda_0(\dot)$ belongs to (i) the class of constant hazard rates and ii the class of Weibull hazard rates, with particular emphasis on the random censorship model. Simulation results concerning the achieved levels and powers of the tests are presented, and the procedures are applied to three data sets that have been considered in the literature.

笔记与分组