跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦持续时间与事件结局的联合建模,未明确属于选择决策模型或因果识别,所给细分不足以准确归类。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Kentaro Fukumoto

事件何时发生影响其结果:内战持续时间与结局的 Copula 有序事件史分析

研究问题
当事件之间或持续时间与事件结局之间存在依赖时,如何联合分析内战持续时间与有序结局,并避免常用方法的估计问题?
方法与思路
作者提出 Copula 有序事件史分析,以边际分布和 Copula 描述时间与事件结局的联合分布,并应用于内战数据。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称方法可处理时间与结局依赖;应用支持战争更久与叛军胜利更可能相关,以及叛军更强与战争更短但不必更易获胜相关。
阅读关注点
应核对结局的排序、删失处理、Copula 选择与尾部依赖设定,并区分应用中的模型关联、参数解释和可能的因果主张。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;依赖导致常用方法偏差的条件未给出,内战应用不能据此确认为因果结论。

原文摘要

Scholars are interested in not just what event happens but also when the event happens. If there is dependence among events or dependence between time and events, however, the currently common methods (e.g., competing risks approaches) produce biased estimates. To deal with these problems, this article proposes a new method of copula-based ordered event history analysis (COEHA). A merit of working with copulas is that, whatever marginal distributions time and event variables follow (including the Cox model), researchers can derive whatever joint distribution exists between the two. Application of the COEHA model to a dataset from civil wars supports two controversial hypotheses. First, as wars become longer, rebel victory becomes more likely but settlement does not (there is dependence between time and events at both tails). Second, stronger rebels make wars shorter but do not necessarily tend to win, as experts predict but fail to establish (rebels’ strength shortens time but has no effect on which events occur). Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文