跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用测量误差非参数回归,未明确提出经济结构模型、因果效应或其他所列细分应用。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Scott M Berry
Raymond J Carroll
David Ruppert

测量误差问题中的贝叶斯平滑样条与回归样条

研究问题
当预测变量存在测量误差时,如何灵活估计非线性回归函数,并在区间估计中直接纳入和调整测量误差带来的不确定性?
方法与思路
作者以平滑样条和回归 P 样条建模,先用迭代条件众数法寻找后验众数及初值,再用 MCMC 抽取联合后验样本。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称完整贝叶斯方法便于计算调整测量误差的区间;在所研究的模拟例子中,其均方误差优于部分贝叶斯及既有频率学方法。
阅读关注点
应核对测量误差与潜在预测变量的分布设定、先验和样条复杂度选择,以及 MCMC 收敛、区间覆盖和模拟比较的范围。
阅读边界
依据稿件版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要。模型识别条件、先验和数值结果未提供,均方误差优势仅限摘要所述例子;其历史性首创表述未经核验,也不推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

In the presence of covariate measurement error, estimating a regression function nonparametrically is extremely difficult, the problem being related to deconvolution. Various frequentist approaches exist for this problem, but to date there has been no Bayesian treatment. In this article we describe Bayesian approaches to modeling a flexible regression function when the predictor variable is measured with error. The regression function is modeled with smoothing splines and regression P-splines. Two methods are described for exploration of the posterior. The first, called the iterative conditional modes (ICM), is only partially Bayesian. ICM uses a componentwise maximization routine to find the mode of the posterior. It also serves to create starting values for the second method, which is fully Bayesian and uses Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques to generate observations from the joint posterior distribution. Use of the MCMC approach has the advantage that interval estimates that directly model and adjust for the measurement error are easily calculated. We provide simulations with several nonlinear regression functions and provide an illustrative example. Our simulations indicate that the frequentist mean squared error properties of the fully Bayesian method are better than those of ICM and also of previously proposed frequentist methods, at least in the examples that we have studied.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文