Bayesian Smoothing and Regression Splines for Measurement Error Problems
测量误差问题中的贝叶斯平滑样条与回归样条AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用测量误差非参数回归,未明确提出经济结构模型、因果效应或其他所列细分应用。
测量误差问题中的贝叶斯平滑样条与回归样条AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
In the presence of covariate measurement error, estimating a regression function nonparametrically is extremely difficult, the problem being related to deconvolution. Various frequentist approaches exist for this problem, but to date there has been no Bayesian treatment. In this article we describe Bayesian approaches to modeling a flexible regression function when the predictor variable is measured with error. The regression function is modeled with smoothing splines and regression P-splines. Two methods are described for exploration of the posterior. The first, called the iterative conditional modes (ICM), is only partially Bayesian. ICM uses a componentwise maximization routine to find the mode of the posterior. It also serves to create starting values for the second method, which is fully Bayesian and uses Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques to generate observations from the joint posterior distribution. Use of the MCMC approach has the advantage that interval estimates that directly model and adjust for the measurement error are easily calculated. We provide simulations with several nonlinear regression functions and provide an illustrative example. Our simulations indicate that the frequentist mean squared error properties of the fully Bayesian method are better than those of ICM and also of previously proposed frequentist methods, at least in the examples that we have studied.