跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究随机试验中随暴露时间变化的处理效应及估计偏差,直接对应因果推断,时间维度本身不足以归为面板方法。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Avi Kenny
Emily Voldal
Fan Xia
James P. Hughes

处理效应随暴露时间变化时的阶梯楔形整群随机试验分析

研究问题
阶梯楔形整群随机试验中,若处理效应随接受处理的时长变化,假定效应立即达到完整水平的模型会估计什么?
方法与思路
作者定义暴露时间上的效应曲线及时间平均、长期效应,推导即时效应模型估计量的期望,并提出曲线估计模型。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,传统估计对应可能含负权重的效应加权和,甚至可能符号反转,并通过模拟和实际数据评估替代模型。
阅读关注点
应核对暴露时间与日历时间的区分、权重产生机制,以及效应曲线形状假设对时间平均和长期效应估计的影响。
阅读边界
这是 arXiv 预印本,同行评审及期刊接收均未核实;摘要未列出权重推导条件,也未说明各模型的具体误差和覆盖率。

原文摘要

Stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trials are typically analyzed using models that assume the full effect of the treatment is achieved instantaneously. We provide an analytical framework for scenarios in which the treatment effect varies as a function of exposure time (time since the start of treatment) and define the "effect curve" as the magnitude of the treatment effect on the linear predictor scale as a function of exposure time. The "time-averaged treatment effect", (TATE) and "long-term treatment effect" (LTE) are summaries of this curve. We analytically derive the expectation of the estimator resulting from a model that assumes an immediate treatment effect and show that it can be expressed as a weighted sum of the time-specific treatment effects corresponding to the observed exposure times. Surprisingly, although the weights sum to one, some of the weights can be negative. This implies that the estimator may be severely misleading and can even converge to a value of the opposite sign of the true TATE or LTE. We describe several models that can be used to simultaneously estimate the entire effect curve, the TATE, and the LTE, some of which make assumptions about the shape of the effect curve. We evaluate these models in a simulation study to examine the operating characteristics of the resulting estimators and apply them to two real datasets.

笔记与分组