On Bootstrap Iteration for Coverage Correction in Confidence Intervals
置信区间覆盖率校正中的自助法迭代AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论通用自助法区间与覆盖误差理论,没有明确对应所列经济计量细分领域。
置信区间覆盖率校正中的自助法迭代AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Iterated bootstrap procedures may be used to reduce error in many statistical problems. We discuss their use in constructing confidence intervals with accurate coverage and show that bootstrap coverage correction produces improvements in coverage accuracy of order n −1/2 in one-sided intervals, but of order n −1 in two-sided intervals. Explicit formulas are provided for the dominant term in coverage error after iteration in each case. These results are used to compare various iterated bootstrap intervals and to assess the effect of bootstrap iteration on other indicators of interval performance, such as position of critical points and length of interval. We show that, for one-sided intervals, the coverage-correction algorithm yields critical points that are second-order correct. This is not the case for two-sided intervals, where second-order correctness is not crucial in obtaining high-order coverage accuracy. We also show that the asymptotic mean increase in length between the original and coverage-corrected intervals is proportional to the coverage error of the original interval. The arguments are illustrated via several examples, including the application of the bootstrap coverage-correction algorithm to reduce coverage error of Bartlett-corrected likelihood-based confidence regions from order n −2 to order n −3.