跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要中的竞争风险指事件时间与删失问题,未涉及金融尾部风险,也未提供所列其他方向的直接依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Yi-Hau Chen

给定 Copula 下相依竞争风险的半参数边际回归

研究问题
竞争风险中只观察最先发生的事件及时间时,如何借助事件间依赖关系的假设识别边际分布,并进行半参数边际回归?
方法与思路
作者假定潜在事件时间的联合分布具有已知 Copula,以半参数变换模型刻画边际回归,并提出非参数最大似然分析。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称提供得分函数和信息矩阵的显式表达,研究大样本与有限样本性质,并可用于相依删失的敏感性分析及临床数据示例。
阅读关注点
核对已知 Copula 假设承担的识别作用、依赖参数如何确定,以及外部信息和敏感性分析如何影响回归结论。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要;边际识别依赖事件间关系假设,摘要未说明 Copula 误设的影响,也未将回归系数解释为因果效应。

原文摘要

Summary Competing risks problems arise in many fields of science, where two or more types of event may occur on a subject, but only the event occurring first is observed together with its occurrence time, and other events are censored. The marginal and joint distributions of event times for competing risks cannot be identified from the observed data without assuming the relationship between events. The commonly adopted independent censoring assumption may be easily violated. An alternative is to assume that the joint distribution of event times follows a known copula, which is an explicit function of the marginal distributions. On the basis of the latter assumption, we consider marginal regression analysis for dependent competing risks, with the marginal regressions performed via semiparametric transformation models, including the proportional hazards and proportional odds models. We propose a non-parametric maximum likelihood analysis, which provides explicit expressions for the score functions and information matrix, and facilitates convenient computations. Large and finite sample properties are studied. We report an illustration with data from an acquired immune deficiency syndrome clinical trial where the censoring may be dependent. The proposal can be readily used as a sensitivity analysis for assessing effects of potential dependent censoring and can incorporate external information on the association of competing risks.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文