跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用高维广义线性模型的选择后检验,未明确给出离散选择或其他所列领域对象。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Shaoxin Hong
Jiancheng Jiang
Xuejun Jiang
Haofeng Wang

含非多项式维干扰参数的可能误设广义线性模型推断

研究问题
高维广义线性模型经过变量选择或正则化后,如何在允许条件方差误设的情况下进行有效检验,并减少虚假重要变量的影响?
方法与思路
作者基于准似然提出降维广义似然比检验,进一步构造自适应和交叉拟合版本,并分析收缩强度、正则化选择及极限分布。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称适当收缩时检验接近 oracle 表现,自适应版本以趋于一的概率成为 oracle 检验,交叉拟合版本可缓解虚假效应。
阅读关注点
应核对允许误设的具体范围、维度增长和稀疏性条件,以及 oracle 定义、收缩选择和交叉拟合消除虚假效应的条件。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要,明确允许的是条件方差误设,不能推广为任意均值误设;oracle 性质及稳健性仍需核对完整条件。

原文摘要

Summary It is routine practice in statistical modelling to first select variables and then make inference for the selected model as in stepwise regression. Such inference is made upon the assumption that the selected model is true. However, without this assumption, one would not know the validity of the inference. Similar problems also exist in high-dimensional regression with regularization. To address these problems, we propose a dimension-reduced generalized likelihood ratio test for generalized linear models with nonpolynomial dimensionality, based on quasilikelihood estimation that allows for misspecification of the conditional variance. The test has nearly oracle performance when using the correct amount of shrinkage and has robust performance against the choice of regularization parameter across a large range. We further develop an adaptive data-driven dimension-reduced generalized likelihood ratio test and prove that, with probability going to one, it is an oracle generalized likelihood ratio test. However, in ultrahigh-dimensional models the penalized estimation may produce spuriously important variables that deteriorate the performance of the test. To tackle this problem, we introduce a cross-fitted dimension-reduced generalized likelihood ratio test, which is not only free of spurious effects, but robust against the choice of regularization parameter. We establish limiting distributions of the proposed tests. Their advantages are highlighted via theoretical and empirical comparisons to some competitive tests. An application to breast cancer data illustrates the use of our proposed methodology.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文