跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要围绕通用估计量的有限样本矩、随机级数和偏差近似展开,未提供所列领域细分的直接依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
T. N. Srinivasan

精确抽样分布未知时估计量有限样本矩的近似

研究问题
当结构参数估计量的精确抽样分布未知时,以估计误差展开的前几项近似有限样本矩,能否正确反映偏差的阶数与存在性?
方法与思路
作者通过例子检验 Nagar 式展开:将估计误差写成按样本量概率阶递减的随机变量级数,并比较截断近似与真实有限样本偏差。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,该近似可产生与真实偏差同阶的误差,还可能把有限偏差与无限偏差判断颠倒,并指出研究随机变量序列时需避免的陷阱。
阅读关注点
核对反例中真实偏差的计算、级数截断及求期望的条件,重点辨别概率阶展开是否足以保证矩近似与极限运算的有效性。
阅读边界
摘要未给出反例细节与有效近似的充分条件;文中所称失效针对特定例子,不能据此断言所有 Nagar 式展开或其他矩近似均不可靠。

原文摘要

The exact sampling distributions of estimators of structural parameters of econometric models are unknown except for a few simple cases. In this situation two alternative approaches towards evaluating finite sample properties of various estimators have been adopted in the literature: (i) Monte Carlo experiments, and (ii) the approach pioneered by Nagar and his students in which the sampling error of an estimator is expressed as the sum of an infinite series of random variables, successive terms of which are of decreasing order of sample size in probability. It is claimed that the small sample properties of the estimator under consideration can be approximated by those of the first few terms of such an infinite series. This paper shows through examples that the Nagar approach can be misleading in the sense that it can yield an estimate for finite sample bias that differs from the true finite sample bias to the same order of sample size. And it can yield estimates of bias which are finite (infinite) while the true bias is infinite (finite). The paper also draws attention to some of the pitfalls to be avoided in studying the properties of an infinite sequence of random variables.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文