跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究动态时间序列模型、多期滞后条件信息和移动平均扰动,直接支持归入时间序列方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Lars Peter Hansen
John C. Heaton
Masao Ogaki

多期条件矩限制所蕴含的效率界

研究问题
动态模型的条件信息滞后超过一期时,不同无条件矩所构造的GMM估计量,其渐近协方差能够达到怎样的下界?
方法与思路
作者由多期条件矩推出无条件矩,构造一大类一致且渐近正态的估计量,并计算该类渐近协方差矩阵的最大下界。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称将效率界分析扩展到更一般的非线性和时间依赖结构,允许条件异方差的移动平均扰动及不可逆的移动平均多项式。
阅读关注点
应核对估计量类别与工具信息集的界定、效率界的计算和可达性,以及异方差、不可逆扰动下的正则条件。
阅读边界
摘要未列完整条件,且明确未直接比较极大似然;来源为版本未注明的OpenAlex索引摘要,不能推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

In this article we study a class of econometric models that imply a set of multiperiod conditional moment restrictions. These restrictions depend on an unknown parameter vector. We construct an extensive class of consistent, asymptotically normal estimators of this parameter vector and calculate the greatest lower bound for the asymptotic covariance matrices of estimators in this class. In so doing, we extend results reported by Hansen (1985) and Stoica, Söderström, and Friedlander (1985), by allowing for more general forms of nonlinearities and temporal dependence. Many dynamic econometric models imply that the expectation of a function of a currently observed data vector and an unknown parameter vector conditioned on information available at some point in the past is 0. We focus on models in which the conditioning information is lagged more than one time period, as in the models considered by Barro (1981), Dunn and Singleton (1986), Eichenbaum and Hansen (1987), Eichenbaum, Hansen, and Singleton (1988), Hansen and Hodrick (1983), Hansen and Singleton (1988), and Hall (1988). Hence we consider econometric models that imply multiperiod conditional moment restrictions that depend on an unknown parameter vector. Within the context of these models, it is possible to estimate the parameter vector without simultaneously estimating the law of motion for the entire set of observable variables. The basic idea is to use the conditional moment restrictions to deduce a set of unconditional moment restrictions. Then estimators of the parameter vector can be obtained by using sample counterparts to the unconditional moment restrictions as described by Sargan (1958) and Hansen (1982). Such estimators are referred to as generalized method of moments (GMM) estimators. For most applications the conditional moment restrictions imply an extensive set of unconditional moment restrictions. As a consequence, there is a vast array of GMM estimators that can be used to estimate consistently the parameter vector of interest. Each member of this set of estimators is constructed using a distinct collection of the unconditional moment restrictions. Hence it is of interest to compare the performances of the alternative GMM estimators. For tractability we investigate only the asymptotic distributions of the estimators in question. More precisely, we use a method suggested by Hansen (1985) for calculating a greatest lower bound for the asymptotic covariance matrices of the alternative GMM estimators, that is, an efficiency bound. We compute the efficiency bound for a rich collection of time series models that imply multiperiod conditional moment restrictions. Hansen (1985) illustrated this method for a time series model with conditionally homoscedastic moving-average disturbance terms for which the moving-average polynomial is invertible. Stoica et al. (1985) calculated efficiency bounds for GMM estimators for autoregressive parameters in autoregressive moving-average models without unit roots. They established that the efficiency bound for GMM estimators of the autoregressive parameters coincides with the asymptotic covariance matrix of the Gaussian maximum likelihood estimators. The models considered by Hansen (1985) in his illustrative example and by Stoica et al. (1885) can be viewed as special cases of the models considered in this article. Although we do not make any direct comparisons to maximum likelihood, we do allow for moving-average disturbances that are conditionally heteroscedastic and moving-average lag polynomials that cannot be inverted.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文