跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究治疗状态误测与插补后的生存回归,未明确提供因果识别或面板结构依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Recai M Yucel
Alan M Zaslavsky

行政数据中存在测量误差的二元治疗变量插补

研究问题
癌症登记数据低报治疗状态时,如何结合较小验证样本校正二元治疗变量,并将低报导致的不确定性传递到生存回归分析?
方法与思路
作者分层建模真实治疗概率及接受治疗后的报告概率,加入医院随机效应,用 MCMC 估计并插补,再合并多重插补分析结果。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称该分解旨在支持报告机制相似但治疗率不同人群间的推广;应用中低报不确定性明显增加化疗系数方差,对其他系数影响较小。
阅读关注点
应核对验证样本的抽取和代表性、低报机制的可迁移条件、医院随机效应设定,以及插补模型与生存回归分析是否相容。
阅读边界
OpenAlex 索引摘要未注明稿件版本;摘要未说明因果识别条件,校正低报并不自动使治疗系数具有因果含义,推广条件也需核对。

原文摘要

Administrative systems—specifically, cancer registries—can be a valuable data source for studies of health care; however, provision of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy is often underreported in such databases. In a study of colorectal cancer in California, a relatively small physician follow-back survey allowed us to model the probability of underreporting. We then wished to model the relationship of true treatment status to covariates in the full database. We developed hierarchical models for imputation of corrected data using data recorded with error in the administrative system and the “validation sample” from the survey. The model includes a model for the probability of receipt of chemotherapy and a model for the probability of reporting given that chemotherapy was received. This factorization of the joint distribution of the true status and reported data is designed to permit generalization from the validation sample to a larger population in which the reporting process is similar but the prevalence of treatment may differ. Hospital random effects are included to represent variation in both treatment and reporting patterns across hospitals. We used Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation techniques to estimate model parameters and impute true treatment status. Valid inferences are obtained by combining the results from multiply imputed datasets. In an analysis of predictors of survival using imputed data that corrected for bias due to underreporting, uncertainty due to underreporting of chemotherapy substantially inflated the variance of estimates of the chemotherapy effect but had little effect on the estimation of coefficients of other characteristics.

笔记与分组