跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确讨论中介路径、暴露后混杂与受控直接因果效应的识别和估计。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Sylvie Goetgeluk
Stijn Vansteelandt
Els Goetghebeur

受控直接效应的估计

研究问题
当中介与结果之间存在混杂,且混杂变量本身受暴露影响时,如何估计受控直接效应并缓解传统加权方法的低效与不稳定?
方法与思路
作者沿线性结构嵌套直接效应模型发展估计量,利用要求较弱的结果条件期望模型,并考虑完全避免逆概率加权的估计方法。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称新估计量更有效率且在较弱结果模型下保持一致;模拟中,不使用逆概率加权的估计量表现最佳,并与有效的最小二乘法竞争。
阅读关注点
应核对受控直接效应的目标定义、中介与暴露后混杂的识别条件,以及所谓较弱模型要求、效率比较和模拟适用情形。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要;完整识别条件、效率界和模拟数值未说明,不能据此将普通中介调整或新方法视为普遍有效。

原文摘要

Summary When regression models adjust for mediators on the causal path from exposure to outcome, the regression coefficient of exposure is commonly viewed as a measure of the direct exposure effect. This interpretation can be misleading, even with a randomly assigned exposure. This is because adjustment for post-exposure measurements introduces bias whenever their association with the outcome is confounded by more than just the exposure. By the same token, adjustment for such confounders stays problematic when these are themselves affected by the exposure. Robins accommodated this by introducing linear structural nested direct effect models with direct effect parameters that can be estimated by using inverse probability weighting by a conditional distribution of the mediator. The resulting estimators are consistent, but inefficient, and can be extremely unstable when the mediator is absolutely continuous. We develop direct effect estimators which are not only more efficient but also consistent under a less demanding model for a conditional expectation of the outcome. We find that the one estimator which avoids inverse probability weighting altogether performs best. This estimator is intuitive, computationally straightforward and, as demonstrated by simulation, competes extremely well with ordinary least squares estimators in settings where standard regression is valid.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文