Analysis of Time-to-Event Data With Incomplete Event Adjudication
事件判定不完整时的事件发生时间数据分析AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确讨论随机试验中的治疗差异检验及未完成终点判定的处理,直接涉及干预效果的推断。
反馈分类问题事件判定不完整时的事件发生时间数据分析AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
In many multicenter, randomized clinical trials, the primary outcome is the time to the first of a number of possible clinical events. An event classification committee may be convened to determine whether events that have been reported by investigators meet the predetermined criteria for primary endpoint events. When interim analyses are performed in such trials, the final classification for many reported events will not be known. Failure to account for the uncertain status of these events may result in incorrect interim analysis. The probability that an unadjudicated event will be confirmed as a primary event can typically be estimated from those events for which adjudication is complete. We show that if each unadjudicated event is weighted according to the probability that it will be the first primary event, then consistent estimates of survival probabilities and regression parameters can be obtained and unbiased log-rank tests of treatment differences performed. Moderate sample consistency of point estimates and variance estimates is verified by simulation. The procedure is illustrated using data from the Coumadin Aspiring Reinfarction Study (CARS) and the Weekly Intervention with Zithromax for Atherosclerosis and Related Diseases (WIZARD) study.